From Deseret News archives:

Generations of tears

Published: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:13 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Perhaps pre-knowledge of the relentless disease is just too much to bear, they posit. Or equally possible, the experts add, people may be reluctant to get the testing done because of insurance concerns.

In a recent study of people at risk for a genetic disease, 63 percent said they wouldn't have genetic testing if the results would be available to insurance companies. The fear is very real.

"Insurance issues potentially pose a real deterrent," said Dr. Jeffrey Botkin, a Salt Lake pediatrician and bioethics expert. "If a company knows what it's doing, it could figure it out. But it's not clear to me to what extent they're sophisticated enough to get family histories."

There's enough evidence of insurance discrimination that the issue has been addressed by a Task Force on Genetic Information and Insurance, created by the Working Group on the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Human Genome Research.

Among other things, the group noted, "One of the ironies of the current crisis in health-care coverage is that developing more accurate biomedical data could make things worse rather than better for those most in need.

"Knowledge useful in predicting the individual's likelihood of developing a particular disease opens the door to both the welcome preventive strategies and the unwelcome possibility of genetic discrimination."

Story continues below
It said information about past, present or future health status, including genetic information, shouldn't be used to deny health-care coverage or service and asked insurance companies to consider a moratorium on use of genetic tests in underwriting.

Several states have taken a proactive stance against genetic discrimination, including California, Maryland, New Hampshire, Ohio, Wisconsin and Minnesota, barring discrimination by insurers against people who have a genetic predisposition to a disease. Others are considering it. Utah's Legislature has twice declined to pass a proposed genetic privacy act.

The good news for people with a positive genetic test, according to Robert Perry of the Perry Group is most insurance policies don't ask about genetic testing. And if they don't ask, you don't have to tell them.

But that only deals with genetic discrimination in cases of a future illness. That's very different than having a diagnosis of an active disease.

So people who have Huntington's in their families exchange information on insurance. There are numerous Web pages explaining how important it is to have insurance before you get a diagnosis of Huntington's or similarly devastating — and expensive — diseases.

Recent comments

This is a truly horrible disease and my heart goes out to these girls...

Gale | Oct. 9, 2008 at 9:51 p.m.

I hope you are planning to make your story into a book. Not only...

Kathy | July 12, 2008 at 7:10 p.m.

This story of the Bishop's is incredible. Just browsing to look up...

Debbie RN | Sept. 23, 2007 at 2:43 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

As a BYU student, and one who takes all those dang calls and mail about...

Hahahahahahahahah!

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

its just laughable seeing how bitter maxie is about last year with his 15...

Good for you...Tiger...keep it PRIVATE. It's nobody's business.

And you wonder why we like Tim Tebow so much. We also win championships and...

Seriously, if the table's were turned and the Utes won and the QB said that...

Weir to Hall of Fame

Mike Weir is a terrific man. Even though he is not LDS, he represents BYU...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

Right on | 12:00 p.m. Nov. 29, 2009 If ANY Ute player or fan had his family...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

Max Hall's actions and the true vitriol that seems to exist between students...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

... deserves to have him be their QB. And guess what, those of you who...

Advertisements