From Deseret News archives:

Bennett defends Senate flag vote

He wants to protect Old Glory but not amend Constitution

Published: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:54 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — Sen. Bob Bennett stands by his vote against a constitutional amendment aimed at banning desecration of the U.S. flag.

The amendment's 66-34 vote Tuesday in the Senate was one vote short of the 67 needed to pass a change to the Constitution.

Bennett, R-Utah, was one of three Republicans who voted against the amendment, a position that was opposite of Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, who strongly supports the amendment.

Hatch spoke with Bennett Tuesday but did not expect him to change his vote. Bennett said Hatch has been "gracious" with his respect toward Bennett's stance.

While 10 states had split votes between their two senators, only Utah and Kentucky had two Republican senators who split votes.

Democrats had opposite votes in Arkansas, California, Michigan, New Jersey and West Virginia, where Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., voted against the amendment for the second time since 2000. He had voted for the amendment in previous sessions, according to the Citizens Flag Alliance. Iowa, New Mexico and Oregon have senators from each party where Democrats voted no while the Republican voted yes.

Story continues below
Adrian Cronauer, a national board member for the Citizens Flag Alliance, said that four out of five people want the flag protected, and if senators voted the way the majority of their constituents would want them to, the amendment would have passed.

"The people themselves elect senators," Cronauer said, pointing out that this was changed from senators getting elected by the states. "They are sent there to represent the people, not their own viewpoints."

By voting against the amendment, Bennett is "running a risk of angering constituents" on this one issue, Cronauer said.

But Bennett said his position on the flag amendment is well-known and has been for more than a decade.

"There is no question that there are some Utahns that are disappointed," Bennett said. "But if I had changed my vote, I think I would get a lot more angry e-mails and phone calls than the ones that are coming in now."

He said when ads run telling people to call his office and urge him to vote in favor of the amendment, he said instead people call and tell him to "stick by your guns."

Bennett said whenever this issues comes up, veterans groups come to talk to him about it and after discussing it, they walk away understanding his point of view.

Bennett is against flag burning but does not want to amend the Constitution over it. He believes the flag can be protected by passing a bill that the Supreme Court could not find unconstitutional.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Teen to be tried as adult

If that were to be what happened, all of the other kids in gangs would...

'Priesthood' explores power of faith

To Anonymous 11:55a.m. I hate to break it to you, but YOUR comment is the...

Lance armstrong. Did you really just say that? Hands down the award goes to...

So thats what IRS Thugs look like, just think we provided them with new...

I think some of you are missing the point. The event was billed specifically...

Fact is | 12:07 p.m. Dec. 11, 2009 Pitta is a very good tight end, not the...

We were served a sampler plate on our first visit by the owner. Good value,...

Pagan angers me by saying that the Inquisition, the Crusades, and the Salem...

BCS did TCU a favor?

What is holy about the University of Utah? And BYU just has a bunch of...

To suggest that the fed is a safer bet than congress is absurd! The fed...

Advertisements