From Deseret News archives:
GM keeps the gas flowing and U.S. soldiers in danger
Why? Like a crack dealer looking to keep his addicts on a tight leash, GM announced its "fuel price protection program" on May 23. If you live in Florida or California and buy certain GM vehicles by July 5, the company will guarantee you gasoline at a cap price of $1.99 a gallon for one year with no limit on mileage. Guzzle away.
As the Associated Press explained the program, each month for one year, GM will give customers who buy these cars "a credit on a prepaid card based on their estimated fuel usage. Fuel usage will be calculated by the miles they drive, as recorded by OnStar, and the vehicle's fuel economy rating. GM will credit drivers the difference between the average price per gallon in their state and the $1.99 cap." Consumers won't get any credits if gas prices fall below $1.99.
"This program gives consumers an opportunity to experience the highly fuel-efficient vehicles GM has to offer in the midsize segment," Dave Borchelt, GM's southeast general manager, said in the company's official statement. Oh, really?
Let's see, the 6,400-pound Hummer H2 averages around nine miles per gallon. It really is great that GM is giving more Americans the opportunity to experience nine-miles-per-gallon driving. And the hulking Chevy Suburban gets around 15 miles per gallon. It will be wonderful if more Americans can experience that, too with GM-subsidized gas.
Our military is in a war on terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan with an enemy who is fueled by our gasoline purchases. So we are financing both sides in the war on terror. And what are we doing about that? Not only is GM subsidizing its gas-guzzlers, but not a single member of Congress, liberal or conservative, will stand up and demand what most of them know: that we must have some kind of gasoline tax to compel Americans to buy more fuel-efficient vehicles and to compel Detroit to make them.
Comments
- Editorial: Red flags at Fort Hood 12:14 a.m.
- Rid Capitol Hill of 'roaches' 12:14 a.m.
- Health proposal not 'reform' 12:14 a.m.
- Afterthoughts 12:14 a.m.
- Letters: No Nativity in D.C. 12:13 a.m.
- Letters: Big picture in Highland 12:13 a.m.
- Letters: Jazz's time will come 12:13 a.m.
- Letters: Equal opportunity backfires 12:13 a.m.
- Letters: Double-dippers save money 12:13 a.m.
- Letters: A plea to senators 12:13 a.m.
- BYU happy to escape with victory
230 - TCU creams U.
225 - Editorial: Mormons and gay rights
206 - Will state consider gay rights law?
149 - Can BYU root for (ick) Utah Utes?
131 - RSL heads to MLS title game
125 - Utes remain silent about BCS
120 - Celtics crush Jazz
104 - TCU stays 4th in AP; Y. 19th, U. 23rd
97 - 3A: Hurricane advances to title game
88
Maybe someone out there can help me understand how raising the state...
I find it interesting that this article doesn't mention any of the several...
"We have to coach better, play better and compete better," Whittingham said....
I think that Pratt case shows that the answer to the question posed is a big NO.
Utah 21 BYU 22 but, before Utah fans get too excited, consider BYU and...
I read that Hall was going to leave it all on the field the rest of the...
For all you Bronco bashers -- have you forgotten about Crowton? Things could...
Peace and tolerance are worthy efforts. My sister and I were very impressed...
The correct realist outlook shows Utah slipping back to being mediocre at...
So the presidents would never do it. But I totally agree.
Once again, a clueless article about conference realignment that only...


You can be the first to comment on this story.