From Deseret News archives:

Pollution report is disputed

Published: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 10:25 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
An American Lung Association report painting the Salt Lake metro area as the fifth worst in the country in terms of a particular kind of air pollution is misleading, says the director of the Utah Division of Air Quality.

However, Rick Sprott quickly adds, the state does have problems with air pollution and he doesn't want people to think the division is being defensive about it.

"There are definitely lots of people in Utah whose health is impacted by the current level of pollution," he said. He supports the association alerting people about that.

The lung association's "State of the Air: 2006" report gives Utah failing marks concerning the finest particle pollutants, for short periods of high pollution levels.

These finest particles are called PM-2.5, meaning they are particles 2.5 microns across or smaller. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, a particle of 2.5 microns is about 30 times smaller than the thickness of a human hair. Pollution that tiny can lodge in the lungs and damage health.

The report said that for PM-2.5, "short-term particle pollution remains a huge air pollution threat in Utah's largest cities."

Story continues below
It ranked the Salt Lake City-Ogden-Clearfield stretch as the country's fifth most polluted, based on short-term levels of this pollution. Logan was rated as sixth worst in the country, while Provo-Orem was said to move up to ninth most polluted, from an earlier ranking in 15th place nationally.

"We currently are meeting all the PM-2.5 standards across the state," Sprott said Wednesday in a telephone interview. "We certainly have a number of days where we exceed the standard, but the health standard itself is based on a three-year average."

That is, the EPA's health standard concerning this pollution does not use the same criteria as measured by the American Lung Association.

In December 2004, the EPA designated all or parts of 209 counties across the country as nonattainment areas in PM-2.5 pollution. These are places that fail to meet federal health standards.

These 209 places — from the District of Columbia to Fairfield, Conn., and from Baltimore to Los Angeles — did not meet EPA health criteria in fine pollution, either because of violating the 24-hour or an annual standard. But no Utah area was designated as a nonattainment region for PM-2.5.

To claim that the Wasatch Front is the fifth worst in the country for PM-2.5 pollution — when it is in attainment and 209 places are not — is misleading, Sprott said.

He says the American Lung Association annual report card system is a good idea.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I image this is a welcome break from the cloudy skies of Salt Lake Valley....

Dr. Cramer has it right on. Since I quit watching television, I see more...

I hope someone in authority would round up about 4 hard rock miners with mine...

I'm holding out for Utah 34 BYU 31. Just our way of honoring tradition. :-)

Editorial: Food is not the enemy

Amen, Kate. I believe you have been treated unfairly. If more women in...

@just curious 1:18 a.m.: "Where in the Constitution does it guarantee a...

Letters: Reckless imbalance

This isn't a political issue, but a Capitalism issue. Why pay American...

Yes, why do we rush things so? It seems that we rush from one thing to the...

It's a sad fact that many of the "tribal councils" that vote for business...

So why dont we just leave the game alone until the end of it? Seriously? You...

Advertisements