From Deseret News archives:

Term-limit warnings now seem overblown

Published: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:39 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Do you know who you are going to vote for this year for the Utah Legislature?

A recent Dan Jones & Associates poll for the Deseret Morning News and KSL-TV shows that only 34 percent of Utahns can name their state House and Senate members.

Only 36 percent said their current lawmaker has done a good enough job to deserve to be re-elected this year.

One may think from those numbers that challengers to the 75 House seats and 16 Senate seats up this year should be in pretty good shape.

Yet in 2004, more than 90 percent of the 104 part-time legislators who ran for re-election won.

In short, Utahns don't know much about their state legislators, but they keep putting them back in office.

In truth, without death or voluntary retirements, there would be very little turnover in the House and Senate. One answer to this concern — seen around the country — is term limits.

You may recall that in 1994 the Utah Legislature on its own passed a 12-year term limit law. Because it exempted sitting legislators, no one would have been forced from office until the 2006 elections. So, how many current lawmakers will be forced from the ballot this year? None.

Story continues below
Several years ago, looking at the looming 2006 deadline, legislators in a bipartisan, overwhelming vote repealed the term-limits law. Even though poll after poll showed strong support for the not-yet-used law, legislators dumped it. They said, among other things, that if citizens don't want them to be re-elected, they just won't vote for them. Elections every two years for House members and every four years for senators is the best term limit, they said.

Who now seeking re-election would have been forced from the ballot this year?

Well, there would have been three longtime senators and nine veteran House members off the 2006 ballot. For those who watch Utah's Legislature, that short list includes some pretty big names.

The No. 1 guy out on the street would have been House Speaker Greg Curtis, R-Sandy. Curtis, who says he will seek another term as speaker if re-elected by voters, was first elected in 1994, just missing the vote that adopted the 12-year term limit law.

Also forced out of office would have been House Majority Leader Jeff Alexander, R-Provo, elected in 1990; and Reps. Sheryl Allen, R-Bountiful (1994); Bud Bowman, R-Cedar City (1992); Jim Gowans, D-Tooele (1992); and Neal Hendrickson, D-West Valley (1990).

Three more veteran House members would have been kept from seeking re-election, but they are leaving the House voluntarily. Retiring are Reps. Brad Johnson, R-Aurora (1990); and Joe Murray, R-Ogden (1994).

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Obama to pledge 17% cut in CO2

Reading this blog gives us such relief that America will never turn away from...

Running game key to BYU offense

Ask Bonco. He says execution is the key. No really, he did. He's said it...

Budget cuts won't help in 2011

To Regretful, I'm right there with you. I don't understand how these guys...

Predicting the unpredictable: BYU wins

"There are no mysteries in today's battle between the Cougars and Utes." -...

Is deflation another word for devaluation? It seems to imply that....

Jazz involved in 4-team race

will Utah hang on to the 8th seed in the West? OKC plays HOU at home next as...

Letters: Global warming a plot

Oh, yes, some hacked e-mails completely explain why ice caps are melting,...

I love it when Danny Hazsard writes I often think he must have no life at all...

Letters: No constitutional right

Our founding fathers purposely framed the Constitution to be a flexible...

I can't imagine that subsidizing 100,000+ illegal immigrants and their...

Advertisements