USU research influences Maine law

Statute expands protective orders to include victim's pets

Published: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 9:37 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A Utah State University professor's research about the connection between cruelty toward animals and domestic violence has influenced lawmakers in Maine to adopt a new law — the first of its kind in the nation — that expands the scope of protective orders to include pets.

Frank Ascione, USU professor of psychology, has conducted extensive research on the link between mistreating animals and mistreating women. One of his studies published in 1998 showed that 71 percent of women in a Utah shelter for battered women said their partner had threatened or hurt the woman's pet.

That study was cited by Maine Rep. John Piotti, a Democrat, who sponsored a bill that became law on Monday that permits judges to include pets in protective orders for people leaving abusive relationships.

A subsequent study by Ascione and some of his colleagues, due to be published soon, involved five Utah shelters and 101 women who reported being battered, along with a control group of 120 women who said they had not been battered.

In that study, 54 percent of the women who had been battered said their partner hurt or killed the animal, while 18 percent of the women reported the abusive partner had threatened the pet. These findings have been supported by other studies conducted since then in South Carolina, New York, Canada and Australia.

Story continues below

"This new law is a progressive effort that should become a model for other states," Ascione said.

"Hopefully, it will convince judges and prosecutors of that the importance of animals in the lives of women who are battered is important enough to include these animals in orders of protection," Ascione said.

This also sends a message to batterers, Ascione said: If they violate a civil protection order by hurting pets, it could result in criminal charges ultimately being filed against them.

His work confirms that abusers threaten, torture or even kill pets as a means of forcing their partner to stay in the relationship and put up with whatever the abuser wants.

In his 1998 study, Ascione said some women reported they stayed behind with the batterer because they didn't know what to do with their pets.

Ascione said other research shows that the women's concern about pets affected their decision to stay in the relationship or leave, and some new findings suggest that abused women can be coerced into committing crimes out of fear for their pets.

Ascione is the author of "Safe Havens for Pets: Guidelines for Programs Sheltering Pets For Women Who are Battered" and another book published last year titled "Children and Animals: Exploring the Roots of Kindness and Cruelty."

He is convinced the new Maine law not only helps protect women and animals, but also will benefit children.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I love this country deeply and what it's freedoms have meant to my particular...

contributions above about the oddness of this article. I realize that a...

I have heard over and over that a 16 or 8 team playoff would "ruin" college...

there is this new bakugan (wantu) that is on TV, but it has not even been...

Beck making most of rare time off job

Whose level are you referring to, Helen? Your BYU fans are capable of...

@Vshar, let's hope your right that the end to your greed, selfishness, and...

Thank God that there were then and now are men like this police officer. And...

Well, you're the one who made the claim that "Obama is a snake that is...

If you took an immunology class at school, you would know that the flu taken...

I could care less about the luxury tax situation. All of it is mute if we...

Advertisements