From Deseret News archives:

A veto override session looks unlikely

Published: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 9:17 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Unless there's a turn-around in the opinions of Utah's 75 state House members, Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. will escape 2006 without a veto override session, despite lobbying by representatives whose bills were killed by the governor.

Huntsman vetoed four bills and four budget line items. Legislative leaders are now polling their members to see if there is two-thirds support in both houses to call an override session.

Unlike previous governors, Huntsman let lawmakers know which bills he would veto. Even though some lawmakers grumbled about the governor's comments, they appear to be doing just what he wanted.

"I think the strategy of being open, up-front, crystal clear always is good policy. And, I think, the right strategy," Huntsman said Tuesday. "We've been consistent all along. . . . I don't think it came as a surprise to anyone what we vetoed."

The governor said he exercised his veto power "very judiciously." Had he not been so direct with legislators, Huntsman said he "very likely" would have had to reject a much larger stack of bills.

"The Legislature generally gives you high marks for being honest," he said. "If they see you as trying to play games and take advantage of a situation where you have to rely on a very careful balance of power, then I think there generally is a sense of retalition.

"I don't think that's taking place at all."

Story continues below
The only vetoed bill that could get enough support for an override session is HB148, a controversial family law bill sponsored by Rep. LaVar Christensen, R-Draper, legislative leaders said.

But even though Christensen, who is running for the U.S. House this year and doesn't want to look weak to any voters, and some of his supports are pushing for such an override, early counts out of the House override poll don't look good for any of the vetoed measures.

"There really is no controversy on the budget line items," said Senate President John Valentine on Tuesday.

Huntsman line item vetoed more than $235 million in transportation spending. But he did it because a mistake in several of the huge budget bills took the road money out of the wrong accounts.

"That will be fixed in our special session," said Valentine. Huntsman says he will call the 104 part-time lawmakers back into special session, probably in May, to debate and vote on Huntsman's "fairer, flatter" personal income tax reforms, which died the last night of the 2006 session in the House.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Just keep your sour comments to yourself. I applaud what the D news has done....

$600M to go to energy plants

Where is the government incentive for nuclear power plants?

Why not just seal off the area where the body is but leave the rest open?...

Miller predicted Tiger's rough road

I disagree with Observation-ist when he says "It's both illogical and...

Nutty Putty Cave to be sealed today

This is a very sad story, but as a climber I don't think it's right to close...

According to economists, the best way to create permanent jobs would be to...

Letters: Can't play together

The difference 11:22 I don't agree that there are NO_STANDARDS_whatsoever...

Harpring's NBA career is over

Bring him back as an ass't replacing Layden next year then when Sloan & Phil...

Study: Global warming not easing

This is all obviously from the same brilliant minds looking the other way on...

$501 per hour.

Advertisements