From Deseret News archives:

A veto override session looks unlikely

Published: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 9:17 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Unless there's a turn-around in the opinions of Utah's 75 state House members, Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. will escape 2006 without a veto override session, despite lobbying by representatives whose bills were killed by the governor.

Huntsman vetoed four bills and four budget line items. Legislative leaders are now polling their members to see if there is two-thirds support in both houses to call an override session.

Unlike previous governors, Huntsman let lawmakers know which bills he would veto. Even though some lawmakers grumbled about the governor's comments, they appear to be doing just what he wanted.

"I think the strategy of being open, up-front, crystal clear always is good policy. And, I think, the right strategy," Huntsman said Tuesday. "We've been consistent all along. . . . I don't think it came as a surprise to anyone what we vetoed."

The governor said he exercised his veto power "very judiciously." Had he not been so direct with legislators, Huntsman said he "very likely" would have had to reject a much larger stack of bills.

"The Legislature generally gives you high marks for being honest," he said. "If they see you as trying to play games and take advantage of a situation where you have to rely on a very careful balance of power, then I think there generally is a sense of retalition.

"I don't think that's taking place at all."

Story continues below
The only vetoed bill that could get enough support for an override session is HB148, a controversial family law bill sponsored by Rep. LaVar Christensen, R-Draper, legislative leaders said.

But even though Christensen, who is running for the U.S. House this year and doesn't want to look weak to any voters, and some of his supports are pushing for such an override, early counts out of the House override poll don't look good for any of the vetoed measures.

"There really is no controversy on the budget line items," said Senate President John Valentine on Tuesday.

Huntsman line item vetoed more than $235 million in transportation spending. But he did it because a mistake in several of the huge budget bills took the road money out of the wrong accounts.

"That will be fixed in our special session," said Valentine. Huntsman says he will call the 104 part-time lawmakers back into special session, probably in May, to debate and vote on Huntsman's "fairer, flatter" personal income tax reforms, which died the last night of the 2006 session in the House.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

So are you saying that women's soccor should evolve into this type of...

The Church has never been about hating gays, or any other group. It has only...

Hatch empathizes with Muslims

To which I add Amen, and Amen! [Thank you!]

RSL in win-Windy City situation

this is going to so much fun? Gee who do i cheer for if REAL plays Galaxy? ...

Hall would rather take a hit

The great QBs make defenses pay for bringing pressure. Hall offers up...

I completely concur, this exhibition game was supposed to be easy and a blow...

Maybe we should just back up 50 years and do away with all laws etc. passed...

So does Hall enjoy absorbing the contact as Call says, or in Hall's own...

Well put, let it die. A lot people who want the health care bill haven't...

D-Will, Price sit out Jazz practice

If Jerry studies "game tape" he will see how to beat the Celtics, see Phoenix...

Advertisements
Advertisement