From Deseret News archives:

$10 fee for road paths?

Vehicle charge would help preserve corridors

Published: Friday, March 24, 2006 12:36 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
OREM — Paying an extra $10 to register vehicles may end up saving some Utah County residents' future homes from demolition.

County, city and transportation officials voted Thursday night in support of adopting a $10 motor vehicle registration fee for the purpose of preserving future road corridors.

A resolution passed by the Mountainland Regional Planning Committee requests that the Utah County Commission make the fee official before April 1, allowing time for the Utah State Tax Commission to be notified so the fee can be collected beginning July 1.

The fee increase is expected to be on the Utah County Commission agenda Tuesday for approval.

"We've been in discussion with the county commissioners, and they are in support of the idea," said Darrell Cook, executive director of the Mountainland Association of Governments.

A state law that went into effect in 2005 allows counties to raise registration fees up to $10 for advance acquisition of rights-of-way for highways of regional significance.

Only the governing body of a county can decide to raise the vehicle registration fees. If raised, the money will be collected and sent to a state fund, where it collects interest until the county requests the money.

Story continues below
The projects for which the money is used will be prioritized by the Mountainland Regional Planning Committee.

Having the money in a local option transportation corridor preservation fund would allow the metropolitan planning organization to use the money to acquire property while it is vacant and available rather than after it has been developed.

In addition to potentially saving homes, it's a much less expensive alternative, Cook said.

A $10 motor vehicle registration increase would raise about $2.6 million a year for Utah County.

During the 2006 legislative session, $10 million was earmarked to be used as matching funds for corridor preservation.

That dollar-for-dollar match was an additional incentive for mayors to support the resolution. Goshen Mayor Dorothy Sprague was the only dissenting vote.

"No one hates a new tax more than I do," said Provo Mayor Lewis K. Billings, "but the state Legislature is not going to pay for our roads. We're going to pay for it one way or another. They've given us this option, and it seems to me we have no other choice."


E-mail: jpage@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Based on most Ute fan comments above, I would have to say Max was wrong, the...

Haley is a division 1 Player. SHes going to a Ute! Just you wait and see!

Notre Dame fires Weis

To those who hate Notre Dame, I know it's tough to get over the 11 national...

Boys basketball rankings

I think it is common consensus that SS Rams are the team to beat in 2A....

Hall reprimanded by MWC

Its cool, he won. Isn't smak talk part of the code?

Utes won't respond to Hall

I am a UCLA grad living in Utah and a big college football fan, though since...

you might consider getting a job (and changing your idiotic name) so that you...

Hall reprimanded by MWC

Bwahahahahahahah.... you are so funny. You know absolutely nothing about the...

Definitely a must-see during the holiday season. My family watches it every...

U. eyes bowl for redemption

Thank Hall, you just guaranteed byu a big time lose in whatever bowl you go...

Advertisements