From Deseret News archives:

Road guidelines issued

Action by Norton angers environmental groups

Published: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 11:18 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — Outgoing Interior Secretary Gale Norton issued guidelines Wednesday defining what qualifies as a locally owned road and likely sparking a new round of disputes between environmentalists and local development interests.

Norton's memo outlining the policy upholds a September ruling by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals that state officials say is good news but environmentalists say threatens protected areas with potential road construction and maintenance.

"This is classic Gale Norton," said Heidi McIntosh, conservation director for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. "It's like getting punched in the head with a velvet glove."

Local government officials could not be reached for comment late Wednesday.

The policy centers on a Civil War-era mining law, Revised Statute 2477, that gave states and counties rights of way across federal lands. Congress repealed the law in 1976 but did not cancel the rights of way created under the law, leading to disputes between local governments and environmental watchdogs over which routes are actual roads that should be maintained.

The federal government created several policies, including a 2003 agreement with then-Gov. Mike Leavitt, on how to handle the complicated task of defining a road claim under the law and who controls it.

Story continues below
But the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last year in a case brought by SUWA that the Bureau of Land Management did not have the authority to determine what constituted a road and rejected several requirements a road claim needed to meet, such as that roads must be established by mechanical construction.

SUWA had long contended that county governments were grading cattle trails, streambeds and long-abandoned jeep tracks across public lands to hurt the chances of the land from being designated as wilderness.

The court also ruled that while only courts could finally determine the ownership issue, state law — such as Utah's statute that says an R.S.2477 route is a road if it had continuous use for 10 years prior to 1976 — is good enough to establish a right of way.

Norton's memo applies the 10th Circuit's ruling nationwide. The new guidelines protect federal lands by clarifying that these roads cannot be expanded or significantly improved without consultation with federal land managers, according to the Interior Department. It ends the 2003 agreement made with Utah and previous policies guiding R.S.2477 claims.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

When Boozer was shooting the free throws, why Sloan didn't substitute Mathew...

Letters: Global warming a lie

actions, I will be forced to be accountable for them. I refuse. I am an...

What's with the Utah fans flashing the double L sign?

@mark: So Sam da Ham... you were just making it up?" I'm a climate...

Utes excited to go to San Diego

"I have no idea why BYU fans are talking smack about bowl opponents. Even if...

TCU versus BSU unpopular

You say to "quit whining and play somebody." Isn't that what everyone is...

BoM translation remarkably consistent

Reading these comments, I start wondering-- Whatever happened to faith? Why...

Utes excited to go to San Diego

All those numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...

BYU eager for crack at Oregon State

All thos numbers when all you reall need to know is that BYU has beat Utah...

So Sam da Ham, when you said this: "Not so. Al Gore is poised to make...

Advertisements