BLM, environmentalists accused of grazing plot

Published: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:46 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Bureau of Land Management unlawfully awarded livestock grazing rights to environmentalists who were determined to reduce grazing in Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, according to a federal lawsuit filed by ranchers and local governments.

Garfield and Kane counties and several local ranchers accuse the BLM of violating the requirements of the Taylor Grazing Act and Interior Department regulations.

The lawsuit was filed Monday in U.S. District Court, in Salt Lake City. The complaint stems from a Jan. 26 decision by Interior Department administrative-law judge James H. Heffernan in Salt Lake City, who ruled that Canyonlands Grazing Corp. legally owns three grazing permits in the national monument.

Naming the Interior Department, the BLM and the national monument as defendants, the lawsuit seeks to have the court cancel Canyonlands' three grazing permits in the national monument.

Heffernan upheld the BLM's decisions and validated the permits, saying the BLM's action in allowing Canyonlands to own the rights was "premised upon a rational, factual and legal basis."

Canyonlands is a subsidiary of the preservationist group Grand Canyon Trust. At the time of the ruling, Bill Hedden, a Moab resident who is Canyonlands' director of the trust and president, said grazing could be sharply reduced in some areas of the permits and ended in others, improving "the health of the land." He could not be immediately reached for comment.

Story continues below

The lawsuit claims Canyonlands Grazing Corp. acquired a livestock permit from the BLM "despite owning no cattle at the time of its application" and "manifesting an intention not to utilize the public-lands grazing allotments for livestock grazing."

Presently, Canyonlands is involved in grazing. Besides the Grand Staircase-Escalante area, it has a large grazing area in northern Arizona, Hedden said in January.

However, Canyonlands Grazing Corp.'s Web site says the group is dedicated to the elimination of livestock grazing on public land. "Specifically, its principal business is the purchase, sale and assignment of grazing preferences on the public lands with the sole intention of compelling the BLM to retire the (Clark Bench) allotment from further livestock grazing," the lawsuit asserts.

The plaintiffs claim that "Canyonlands Grazing Corp. eventually acquired a few livestock, utilized its grazing permit for what amounts to a conservation purpose, and effectively mothballed its grazing permits for the past three grazing seasons."

The potential loss of more than 380,000 acres for livestock grazing will reduce the range-fed cattle industry in Kane and Garfield counties "leaving a void in the economy of each county and contributing to a reduction in taxable income" in the counties, the lawsuit says.


E-mail: bau@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Blazers get the unbalanced trade they seek while not signing Millsap away...

Ricky Bobby - THE JAZZ DO NOT WANT TO TAKE BACK EQUAL SALARIES. They want to...

Owls need holes for nest

Despite the fact that logging has all but stopped in the pacific northwest...

My understanding of what FAIR is trying to do, is to provide well thought out...

Jazz will resign Milsap. If they don't it will be ahuge mistake. First off,...

Stadium of Fire flag burning was fake

I was waiting for it to be burned on the big metal structure right by the...

Hey Ute fan... the Utes had a good season. And keep throwing that BCS bowl...

Tyrus Thomas is in the last year of his contract too so what is the point for...

CougarKeith, people don't know how to properly retire the flag, what they did...

It is just talk but since it was brought up: IF we can get Prizbilla &...

Advertisements