From Deseret News archives:

Water-fluoridation issue heads to court

Officials say Holliday Water is violating law

Published: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:27 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Salt Lake County officials believe a small water company is in direct violation of the law by not adding fluoride to the water supply.

To push their point, they filed a lawsuit Tuesday asking for a judge's ruling to force Holliday Water Co. to follow public health rules that require water fluoridation.

"It's an issue that just needs to be decided," County Mayor Peter Corroon said. "Obviously it's not going to be decided between Holliday Water Company and our Salt Lake Valley Health Department. Nobody will budge."

The stalemate began in 2000 after voters approved adding fluoride to the county's drinking water supply by a margin of 58 to 42 percent. Holliday Water Co. officials maintain they are not subject to the fluoridation rules, claiming their water system is independent of the county's. The company's lawyer could not be reached for comment Tuesday evening.

All water systems in the county had until October 2003 to begin fluoridating water. Some, including Holliday Water, got the extensions they asked for. The others are now in compliance, said county health spokeswoman Pam Davenport, who declined to comment further because of the lawsuit.

Story continues below
The heart of the issue is whether Holliday Water is a "functionally separate" water system entitled to choose whether to fluoridate or not, Corroon said.

County officials believe Holliday Water is not separate because its water system is connected to the Salt Lake City Metropolitan water system. Holliday Water stockholders disagree.

"I'm not a scientist — I don't know whether fluoride is healthy or detrimental to our well-being," Corroon said. "I have no feelings one way or the other. We just want to get this issue resolved."

County Councilman David Wilde, who also serves on the Salt Lake Valley Board of Health, believes it's a question of upholding the law.

"The issue was approved by the voters and the water company hasn't complied with what the voters approved," Wilde said.


E-mail: ldethman@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

BYU's old uniforms?

I guess a "tribute" to the team of 1984 is fine, but the Royal blue was bad...

Geez Charles. Why don't you take your arrogance and condescension down a...

Congratulations on your win Utah!! Cougars get defeated yet once again!

Ohio lawsuit over air pollution

Offloading or externalizing basic costs of doing business have been a staple...

Letters: Left-wing hypocrisy

@ 3:48, Use your computer and be prepared for some fascinating reading....

Principal leaves giant imprint

There is NOBODY who deserves this award more than you-Congrats-you were the...

30 And thus, in their aprosperous circumstances, they did not send away any...

Letters: Left-wing hypocrisy

Gee, Mike, do you have anything that backs up that claim?

Lets here it for the most rediculous call ever... Everybody leaps to try...

Biking is dangerous. Deal with it.

Advertisements