From Deseret News archives:

PFS chief says foes can't stop nuclear waste

Utah updates challenge; $100M deal for Goshutes?

Published: Thursday, March 9, 2006 9:14 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — A Nuclear Regulatory Commission license in hand, Private Fuel Storage's chairman said Wednesday that the consortium of utilities is moving forward with its plans for a high-level nuclear waste disposal site in Utah's Skull Valley — and he doesn't think opponents can stop it.

"Yes, there is hope for our future," John Parkyn said, holding up the license at an NRC conference in Maryland, drawing applause from the crowd.

In other developments:

• The state of Utah this week filed an updated challenge to the PFS proposal in the U.S. District Court of Appeals for Washington, D.C. It challenges the NRC's license, issued to PFS last month.

• And Time magazine is reporting that PFS would pay the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians up to $100 million over 40 years for the right to operate its proposed repository on the band's reservation.

However, neither Skull Valley Band chairman Leon Bear nor PFS spokeswoman Sue Martin would confirm the figure to the Deseret Morning News.

In Maryland, Parkyn told the NRC conference he is seeking additional utilities with nuclear plants interested in moving waste to the PFS site, 45 miles southwest of Salt Lake City. And he downplayed any chances Utah's congressional delegation, governor and other opponents have at stopping PFS's plans.

Story continues below
That includes the recent creation of the Cedar Mountains Wilderness Area, approved by President Bush in January. The wilderness area gives federal protection to land adjoining the Utah Test and Training Range and includes PFS's preferred route for a rail line that would be built to move nuclear waste through Skull Valley to the storage site.

The congressional delegation had earlier pointed out that the wilderness designation did not stop the project outright but at least could remove a transportation option. PFS could still use a trucking option, although it still needs permission to use public land to build a transfer facility to truck the waste.

But Parkyn maintains that the wilderness area does not rule out using another rail route.

"That doesn't mean you can't put a railroad there, whether Sen. (Orrin) Hatch understands that or not. It certainly would make getting that land lease for the purpose harder.

"We will get the fuel to the site because it's a legal commodity, and we now have a license to receive it," Parkyn said.

Parkyn said the Cedar Mountain reserve is not a real wilderness either, arguing that the wilderness is in the mountains and that the delegation just "drew a bubble" around the mountains to block the nuclear waste — an argument he says could matter later down the line.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

The Las Vegas Bowl is going to pass on BYU and take Utah. They are not...

I'd like to thank all the single fathers out there who do all they can for...

I agree with most of the poll questions, also. They failed to mention all the...

CNN is a pretty conservative network, actually. Just b/c FOX news exists,...

The forgotten ship: USS Utah

I just returned today from Pearl Harbor. I passed on seeing the Arizona...

He took no guff from anyone. i loved him

Editorial: 10 years of TRAX

I think trax is a good step... but am looking forward to more mass transit...

Actually most Utah fans prior to this season knew that we would be rebuilding...

Williams want to be an all star he should play like one night in night out....

I totally agree with the whole article. I put leaves in a compost box and...

Advertisements