From Deseret News archives:

Port controversy could widen racial chasm

Published: Friday, Feb. 24, 2006 7:02 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
If there were a real security issue here, I'd join the critics. But the security argument is bogus and, I would add, borderline racist. Many U.S. ports are run today by foreign companies, but the U.S. Coast Guard still controls all aspects of port security, entry and exits; the U.S. Customs Service is still in charge of inspecting the containers; and U.S. longshore- men still handle the cargos.

The port operator simply oversees the coming and going of ships, making sure they are properly loaded and offloaded in the most cost-effective manner. As my colleague David E. Sanger reported: "Among the many problems at American ports, said Stephen E. Flynn, a retired Coast Guard commander who is an expert on port security at the Council on Foreign Relations, 'who owns the management contract ranks near the very bottom.' "

What ranks much higher for me is the terrible trend emerging in the world today: Sunnis attacking Shiite mosques in Iraq, and vice versa. Danish caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad, and violent Muslim protests, including Muslims killing Christians in Nigeria and then Christians killing Muslims.

And the Washington Post story about how some overzealous, security-obsessed U.S. consul in India has created a huge diplomatic flap — on the eve of Bush's first visit to India — by denying one of India's most respected scientists a visa to America on the grounds that his knowledge of chemistry might be a threat. The U.S. Embassy in New Delhi has apologized.

Story continues below
My point is simple: The world is drifting dangerously toward a widespread religious and sectarian cleavage — the likes of which we have not seen for a long, long time. The only country with the power to stem this toxic trend is America.

People across the world still look to our example of pluralism, like no other. If we go Dark Ages, if we go down the road of pitchfork-wielding xenophobes, then the whole world will go Dark Ages.

There is a poison loose today and America — America at its best — is the only antidote. That's why it is critical that we stand by our principles of free trade and welcoming the world to do business in our land, as long as there is no security threat. If we start exporting fear instead of hope, we are going to import everyone else's fears right back. That is not a world you want for your children.


New York Times News Service

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Cage or no cage.. that snake is HOW BIG?? 20 + feet do you know what kind of...

It's too bad that Max Hall made those stupid comments, or else he would...

Nebraska could now help TCU

Enjoy it while you can TCU. Next year you will see us heading to the BCS Bowl.

Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing

Why don't the professors rise up and do something that will make a difference...

Grief is OK, even for Mormons

Thanks.

Congressional vote on playoffs?

This country has other higher priorities: 1) Job market --don't be fooled by...

Loved watching him play at GT, and figured he was the classic example of a...

Was this justice? No American court would have convicted on the presented...

Those are some great arguments against Beck and Skousen. People who resort...

He is awesome. We need more reps like him. Go Jason!

Advertisements