From Deseret News archives:

Salt Lake benefits plan gets final OK

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2006 9:55 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Pending approval from the city's insurer, Salt Lake City employees will be able to enroll adult siblings, roommates, parents, friends or romantic partners for insurance through the city.

The City Council gave final approval Tuesday night for a plan that would allow city employees to designate an adult who can be part of the employee's insurance plan. The measure passed unanimously.

"Families (that) are support systems sometimes come in non-traditional packages," said Jill Remington Love, the council member who first broached the idea in July. "With this ordinance, we are offering our city employees the opportunity to recognize someone in their household they can be in a long-term caring relationship with."

The city would offer coverage through the Public Employees Health Plan (PEHP), which the city already uses for roughly 2,900 employees, and expand the categories of people who can enroll to allow an additional 58 to 96 people access to the plan. Employees first must show joint financial obligations such as car or house loans, joint checking accounts or credit cards, or mutual beneficiaries on life insurance policies. It's estimated to cost the city between $140,000 and $225,000.

Story continues below
Before the council can start enrolling people, PEHP likely will issue a decision about whether the plan meets PEHP's criteria for coverage, said Jennifer Bruno, a policy analyst for the council. If not, the council may have to come up with a new plan, she said.

The council developed the adult-designee idea after Mayor Rocky Anderson proposed a similar measure which would have offered insurance exclusively to unmarried couples with a strong emphasis on equality for homosexual partners. Anderson's executive order in September would have covered between 10 and 22 people and would have cost the city between $17,000 and $63,000.

"My proposal was simply to provide equity for employees regardless of marital status or sexual orientation," Anderson said. The City Council's plan "dodges the issue of equality altogether."

Eric Jergensen, one of the council members on a subcommittee that hammered out the ordinance, said the council did not dodge equality issues and the council's plan does not shun gay or lesbian rights.

"We are pro-employees, pro providing quality of life," Jergensen said.

PEHP asked a judge to decide whether Anderson's order was legal, and then an Arizona law group and several Salt Lake residents sued to block the order. Third District Court Judge Stephen Roth heard the case Jan. 5 and has not yet ruled.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

We had a football party at my house with fans that wore blue and fans that...

I personally found this article funny. I enjoy following Jody's articles and...

Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal

I played football in college, and coached for 15 years. There is no need...

This whole thing is a joke. I don't like BYU or Max Hall, but he said what...

The 2009 BYU and Utah football teams are good teams for the Mountain West....

Utes won't respond to Hall

BOO HOO hahahaha

Good article!

BCS stable at top, Y. up to 14

Don't use stupid logic, Florida, Alabama and Texas all had close last second...

I think its stupid how people want to put so much hate towards Max Hall and...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

I am a life long BYU fan, and of course I was more than happy with a win on...

Advertisements