From Deseret News archives:

Lawmakers taking look at gift card expirations

HB324 would make certificates over $25 good for 5 years

Published: Thursday, Feb. 2, 2006 11:55 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
When is a gift certificate not a gift certificate?

Buy one, wait a few years to try to redeem it and you might find out.

Gift certificate expiration is the topic of HB324, which was discussed but not voted on by the House Business and Labor Committee on Thursday. The bill would prohibit a gift certificate — meaning a certificate, electronic card or other medium — worth $25 or more from expiring within five years after it is issued.

The bill's sponsor, Rep. Larry Wiley, D-West Valley, said many people receive gift certificates tucked away in wedding cards but only discover them later.

"Five years just seems like a reasonable amount of time that a person would need to use a certificate," he told the committee. "I myself have had occasions where I've received gift certificates and put them on my top drawer, and my wife has put things on top of it and I just forget about it. And when you do some spring cleaning-type things, you come across it."

Story continues below
Some legislators questioned both the $25 threshold and five-year period. Rep. Curtis Oda, R-Clearfield, said five years "makes it very difficult for a business that issues a certificate to track, and it becomes an accounting nightmare."

Rep. Craig Frank, R-Pleasant Grove, wondered if the $25 amount would result in merchants instead issuing gift certificates in smaller denominations to avoid the bill's effects. Frank admitted being victimized by such an expiration when he tried to use an old certificate at a restaurant.

"I thought I was going to get a meal on the card and then — boom! — it comes time to pay the bill and I don't have access to that money because the card's expired," he said. "In my opinion, it would seem as though if certain consideration has been given . . . the contract should stay in force regardless of what the period of time is, as long as the business is still providing services or product for the lifetime.

"I understand it's a clerical issue, and I understand that there's some real heartache there having to carry over that account that continues to accrue from year to year to year to year, but a lot of that's done now with the push of a button, and the clerical aspect of that is very minor."

The committee's chairman, Rep. Stephen Clark, R-Provo, had a similar line of reasoning.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

These comments largely express what Americans are feeling about Washington,...

TCU creams U.

We appreciate the Ute fans who came to the game. We hosted several at our...

RSL heads to MLS title game

Great win. Bring the cup home guys! We need something to cheer about in...

Outsider looking in. This is why I love small town football. Comments on...

TCU creams U.

Thanks Mitch by pointing out the reality. The score means nothing in the...

2A: San Juan claims title

the 2009 team is a great team. I would rank them the 2nd best team to come...

Its been a long time since they've been dominated under Whitt like this....

This is the same team that the Utes barely beat right? Just checkin' Go...

Dear Tom, I used to listen to your radio show - I was a big fan. When did you...

RSL heads to MLS title game

Those shootouts are the most exciting ten minutes in all of sports. What...

Advertisements
Advertisement