From Deseret News archives:

Bridging the Religious Divide: Open letter to the community

Published: Friday, Jan. 20, 2006 8:17 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The "bridges" dialogue project had its limits. Many voices from the community were absent, including people who do not feel there is a divide or who are too angry or apathetic to feel it is worth talking. A few groups were small and had less diversity of perspective than desirable. Some people felt the process was too short. Some groups found it difficult to meet on a regular basis over the summer. Everyone who participated was learning how to approach the conversation.

But most people who participated in the "bridges" dialogues found the process deeply worthwhile. As this letter shows, many came away with new insights and expanded perspectives. Some found the experience life-altering. Others discovered a new — and expanded — sense of community. "I felt an outsider," commented one person at the end of the project. "Now I feel I can be myself in community." "This process reminded me that we are in this community together," said another. "It put a human face on the divide. I realized I can't really retreat to my own side. I've realized we share this community."

Perhaps most important, many came away with a renewed sense of possibility. One participant, reflecting the feelings of many, summed it up this way: "I feared meaningful dialogue was not possible. I've seen possibilities for dialogue turn into 'you're wrong and now I'm going to tell you why.' But this experience convinced me people are capable of honest open dialogue. It makes me hopeful."

What the process was like

Story continues below
As one might imagine, many participants approached the process with trepidation. Some worried that the atmosphere would be contentious. Others feared being the target of "venting." What the participants found, however, with very limited exceptions, was honest — yet respectful — conversation. As one person commented, "I came in prepared to meet people with an ax to grind who wanted to grind it on me. But I feel we have been able to dialogue freely and we've had real issues. I never felt attacked." Another said, "There were earnest expressions of frustration at times, but I never felt 'vented upon' by others."

Most groups made agreements when they first met about how they wanted to talk to each other, typically calling for honest but respectful exchange, and agreeing to speak up if someone said something that was offensive or difficult for them to hear. To the surprise of some, the biggest challenge at times was reluctance to open up contentious issues for fear of offending each other.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Nila Horton, a participant in the "Bridging the Religious Divide" project, says of her life in Utah: "We've had some wonderful experiences, but also some very negative ones."

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Why does Mitt think he needs a licens to steal. He has been doing OK with out...

Thanks for all those years of hard play. It was fun watching you play!

GM Chairman names new head

Shouldn't the headline read: Obama and the Unions name new head of GM?

Felt's Facts season recap

Baker was probably more deserving than Gillies but its all about who the...

Isn't the UN a group of nations that would love nothing better than to see...

Great job. How long has Sudbury been coaching little league football in So....

Ellen is always good for a laugh and a look into the soul of a true liberal...

I can't believe I took the time to read this article about a sad...

All humans are not perfect even those of you who make it sound like you are....

You guys who think CJ is done are going to be so surprised. If you know...

Advertisements