Zoning change downed in Bluffdale

City Council denies last-ditch effort to appease developers

Published: Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2005 11:05 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
BLUFFDALE — The Bluffdale City Council on Tuesday narrowly voted against what could be seen as a last-ditch attempt to appease two land developers attempting to pull 4,000 acres of undeveloped land from this rural city.

On a contentious 3-2 vote, the council denied a zoning change that would have applied the city's mixed-use (MU) zone to parts of Area 4, a 4,000-acre chunk of land on Bluffdale's southwest corner that makes up about 40 percent of the city's land area.

Councilwoman Laurie Maxfield moved that the change be denied, blaming the newly elected mayor and council members — and a vocal residents' group — for the city's previous inability to come to a deal with the developers. She said the MU zone was not appropriate for Area 4 and approving it would be compromising good planning in reaction to a political controversy.

The land is mostly owned by two developers who have been seeking to develop it for years. The landowners, South Farms and South Hills Development, want to build residential and commercial developments at densities higher than most of the rest of Bluffdale, which is made up largely of one-acre lots.

But in December 2003, when the council denied their application for a zoning change, the developers filed a disconnection lawsuit, seeking to de-annex the land. That land would then either become an unincorporated part of Salt Lake County or could be annexed by nearby Herriman.

The city has since attempted to negotiate with the developers, creating a zoning category called the special development plan, or SDP, which could be applied to Area 4 and would allow the whole area to be master-planned at once. However, residents opposed to the development formed a group called Bluffdale United and began collecting signatures for a referendum to bring the SDP to a public vote.

Then, earlier this fall, the council voted to approve two consent decrees that included a development agreement with the developers. The consent decrees were brought before 3rd District Judge Anthony Quinn in the developers' disconnection lawsuit, with both the city and the developers asking him to accept the agreement and dismiss the suit.

But Quinn refused to accept the agreement, saying he was being asked to step into a political disagreement over land use when the lawsuit was solely about a proposed disconnection.

Tuesday's vote pitted outgoing council member Maxfield and returning Councilwoman Martha Speed against recently defeated Mayor Wayne Mortimer, defeated Councilman Morris Clark and returning Councilman Craig Briggs. Clark and Maxfield, who did not run for re-election, are being replaced by two council candidates who are members of Bluffdale United, and Mortimer's replacement, Claudia Anderson, is also a Bluffdale United member.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

Guess what?!! The rest of the world thinks MORMONS ARE NOT MORAL!!!

It's rotten in Baghdad

@If I were Obama | 7:25 a.m. So funny. LMAO with this comment. Just...

"Fight the Power" is trying to make a civil rights analogy here that...

Utah Jazz finances not quite so bleak

To imply that seniority is any substitute for effort under Jerry Sloan is...

Jazz brass debate Millsap match

Both for us fans and Jazz management. Millie was a great 2nd round pick,...

Like so many laws suits, Utah will loose. This use isn't any violation of...

Let's control borders

"The Sutherland institute study shows that 96% of the immigrants lead crime...

continued: But most important, her gaffes reveal one who is woefully lacking...

suffers from a terrible case of 'god complex' wherein he thinks he is god the...

Biden or Sarah Palin? Looking at a catalogue of Biden’s gaffes, one is...

Advertisements