Activists sue Forest Service over snowmobile decision

Coalition claims land was alloted without proper public input

Published: Friday, Dec. 16, 2005 12:21 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Environmentalists have sued the Forest Service in federal court alleging that a decision to allow snowmobiles back into part of the Wasatch-Cache National Forest was made without proper public input and should be stopped.

A coalition of four environmental protection groups claim in the lawsuit filed Thursday that Wasatch-Cache supervisor Tom Tidwell, forest supervisor Faye Krueger and Logan District Ranger Robert Cruz failed to "adhere to requirements for public participation" when they decided to adopt a proposal to re-open portions of the Cache-Box Elder Management Area to winter motorized use.

Wasatch-Cache National Forest officials closed those areas to snowmobiles in March 2003, leaving 42 percent — nearly 540,000 acres — open to motorized use and only 1 percent closed.

Non-motorized winter recreation has always been allowed in the area, but conflicts have arisen between between groups who ski and snowmobile groups.

The problem, according to the suit, is the dispute was resolved without issuing public notices of meetings and without public comment.

The decision, according to Bryan Dixon, conservation chairman for the Bridgerland Audubon Society, "cut protection to non-motorized users" and gave up 4,800 acres more to motorized users. "The Forest Service caved to political pressure. They acted illegally and made an acceptance behind closed doors. We can't have that happening."

Story continues below

The decision has renewed the dispute as well as damaged the environment, the coalition claims.

"We're not trying to end snowmobiling," Dixon said. "We're just trying to find a small area of land with diverse terrain, that is accessible by foot, close to the roads so families can use it, relatively safe from avalanche danger and keep it available for that kind of use."

The suit asks the court to impose a temporary injunction on the implementation of the new plan until their concerns can be heard. Among those, the groups claim the plan violates the National Environmental Policy Act.

The Forest Service is expected to file a response to the suit in the coming week.

A similar lawsuit was filed in Washington, D.C., in 2004, against the National Park Service. It cited in particular decisions to allow snowmobiles in Yellowstone National Park. Since then, limits have been set on the recreation vehicles can be on the property.


E-MAIL: wleonard@desnews.com; gfattah@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

BYU football: 2010 commitments

While reading most of the comments by the fans of BYU and Utah, one could say...

It's going to be funny in 20 years when all this seems stupid, and you are on...

When I can finally establish in every moment of my life peace, forgiveness,...

Same can be said about the beauty parlor, or any other place where we shed...

Reading all of this makes my heart wrench. I was raised LDS and I have been...

I'm sick of the articles saying he's like every other man with temptations....

2 men cited in trespassing on LDS plaza

To the 7:04 commentator, They are also married. Beyound that, what...

lets go dig it up they're not indeginous to here or related to us. but i...

That is a terrible lead! When did this happen? What does this picture from 10...

"Who are you calling a pedophile? While I do believe Mr. Pratt is guilty of a...

Advertisements