From Deseret News archives:

Judge rules against state worker sick-leave claims

Employees to appeal benefits decision to Utah Supreme Court

Published: Thursday, Dec. 8, 2005 10:28 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A judge dealt a setback Thursday to state employees who went to court to stop a new law that would change how unused sick leave is handled upon their retirement.

However, the employees say they will file an appeal with the Utah Supreme Court.

Currently, many state workers can exchange one eight-hour day of sick leave for a month's worth of medical insurance after they retire.

But this year the Legislature passed HB213, which lets workers get a dollar-for-dollar exchange for unused sick days. The bill also requires workers to cash out one-quarter of their saved sick leave and put it into their 401(k) retirement savings plan.

The Utah Public Employees Association and five state workers went to court to stop the law from taking effect Jan. 1, 2006, and 3rd District Judge William Barrett heard five days of testimony over a two-week period.

Barrett on Thursday said employees do not have a contract with the state until they are vested, which does not happen until they retire or become disabled, so any change in their benefits is not a breach of contract.

Also, since employees do not have a contract with the state until retirement, they cannot claim their personal property is being taken, the judge said.

Story continues below
Barrett also denied the workers' request for an injunction that would prevent the law from going into effect. Barrett said an injunction would harm the public because it would stop the Legislature from enacting laws and controlling its own budget.

The judge said he sympathized with workers who will be negatively affected by HB213, noting a former clerk who worked for him for 10 years has a considerable number of unused sick days and probably will not fare well under HB213.

But Barrett said he swore to uphold the law when he became a judge and cannot let emotion cloud his decision.

Robert Anderson, a state Department of Health employee, said outside the courtroom that he feels "betrayed" by the Legislature and state officials.

"For the last 25 years, they've promised certain things: If I conserved my sick leave, I could turn that in," Anderson said. "Now they're going to renege on that promise."

Anderson, 58, said he has more than 2,000 hours of sick leave that he deliberately saved for retirement that he will not be able to use the way he has been told for decades. During his 34 years with the state, he has used vacation time when sick in order to build up the bank of sick days for the retirement plan he believed would be in place when he finally retires.

The UPEA represents 8,500 members, of which 5,000 are state workers. About 25,000 people work for the state.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Depleted uranium OK'd for storage

DU does NOT become more radioactive over time. The initial decay products...

No offense Harvey, but if people are telling you you'll be playing on...

Panel passes BCS playoff bill

BCS bids then their system wouldn't continue! MWC teams don't need the BCS...

I'm still hoping that the church will find a more open space for the temple....

Helicopters rescue stranded hikers

Thanks to all of those who know what it is like to volunteer time and...

BCS did TCU a favor?

be called, Church against State

Hes actually predicted #1 pick in the draft right now and deserving so,...

Knights 'D' powers past Vikes

Nick Emery is the best player ever bar none

I am also a CAL fan and Californian. I don't hate Utah, I just don't think...

BCS did TCU a favor?

the BCS bowl bid and played in the Vegas Bowl as the MWC winner Do you...

Advertisements