From Deseret News archives:

Growing number of couples opting not to have children

Published: Sunday, Dec. 4, 2005 11:49 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
"In short it's because there is so much more opportunity for women these days," she said in an e-mail exchange. "You don't need kids to fill your life."

Like Roggenkamp, Defago observed that not having to raise children had given her and her husband a great many material advantages.

"We have a wonderful life," she said. "We have a home in London and a home in Spain. We work hard over the summer and take the winter off to travel. We are not tied into school timetables."

Nonetheless she said that in researching her book she found that financial considerations were not determining factors for most people who decided that children were not an option for them.

Carole Matthews is a novelist and child-free as well, in her case because of illness.

"It was when I was researching my latest novel, 'With or Without You,' that it really brought it home to me that kids in the Western world really have become a lifestyle choice," she said in an e-mail exchange.

Story continues below
"Go out to any country in the developing world and children are still very much an integral part of society — not just a desirable 'bolt-on,' " she said. "They need children to work the fields, look after siblings and to provide for the parents in their old age — they simply can't manage without them on a very basic level. It isn't a choice whether you have kids or not."

One common misperception is that being child free is about disliking kids and their parents, according to Rachel Pildis, 39, of Oak Park, Ill.

Pildis has been a member of the Chicago chapter of the international child-free network called No Kidding! since 1999. She says plenty of people without kids enjoy being around children. They're just happy to send the kids home with their parents at the end of the day, she said.

Pildis joined No Kidding! — with about 200 members in the area who enjoy activities such as book clubs, hikes and dinners — because she and her husband wanted to meet other child-free people who shared their lifestyle.

Roggenkamp, who has decided not to have kids, and her husband are young — he is 27 — and so have not totally ruled out a change of heart, but think that is unlikely.

"My husband and I have talked about the very slight chance of changing our minds and we have decided either he will have a vasectomy, or I will have a tubal ligation by 2008," she said.

"In the meantime, I take birth control pills religiously. If I were to get pregnant, I would have an abortion.

"The chance of us changing our minds is infinitesimal. Neither of us has ever had a desire to take care of children and I don't suspect that will happen in the future."

Recent comments

THink about it: Have you seen the statistics on MARITAL...

S in oh | Nov. 24, 2008 at 3:26 p.m.

Think About It, you have apparently discovered something about...

Don | Aug. 5, 2008 at 12:40 a.m.

yes, life IS an amazing thing. but there are an estimated...

tawny | May 22, 2008 at 2:21 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Hey Cade, let's be honest. Sand volleyball would not come out on top. And...

Senators seek cost controls

Where's the GOP and AARP when we need them?. What's the first thing Mao...

We recently switched to DirecTV to get the MTN. I was excited when I heard...

Expert paid $500K for Mitchell report

I would have only charged the State $100.00 and still came up with the same...

Merlin Olsen was so awesome. Growing up I wanted so much to be like him as a...

Pitta named to All-America team

I agree let's be honest, Utah produces good to average QB's that translates...

6'2 210 sounds like d1 material to me, whatever school misses out on him...

Romney: Let private sector flourish

Enough of Mitt Romney's coy "oh I don't know if I would run for President...

"Utah and USU will never be respected and held in the highest regard like BYU...

This will be a bigger disaster than the first O.J. trial was. Too bad...

Advertisements