From Deseret News archives:

Kane, feds to meet soon to discuss roads issue

Feud involves hundreds of miles of routes in county

Published: Monday, Nov. 21, 2005 11:45 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Lawsuits and bluster notwithstanding, Kane County and the federal government will soon enter into negotiations to resolve a 2 1/2-year feud over ownership of hundreds of miles of dirt roads in Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. "Kane County has agreed to begin the consultation on Nov. 30, 2005," says a letter written by Gale Norton, secretary of the U.S. Interior Department.

In Kanab on Monday afternoon, Commissioner Mark Habbeshaw took a break from a County Commission meeting to confirm the upcoming session.

"I'm pretty optimistic about it," he said. "We're going to meet with Interior and the BLM (Bureau of Land Management) on Nov. 30 up there in Salt Lake, in the BLM offices, and try to see if we can't work something out."

Norton's comments came in a letter to Sen. Richard Durbin, an Illinois Democrat who demanded last June that Norton intervene in the dispute or he would hold up the confirmation of a top Norton deputy, Patricia Lynn Scarlett.

On Friday, the same day Durbin received the latest in a series of letters from Norton, Scarlett was confirmed as deputy director.

It was also the same day that Kane and Garfield counties filed a federal lawsuit challenging road closures and use restrictions in the monument's management plan. The lawsuit was described as a formality to protect the county's legal standing before the statute of limitations expired.

Durbin has been a harsh critic both of Kane County and what he saw as Interior Department inaction.

Story continues below
Last June he wrote, "This current situation is a direct consequence of the department's failure to take action against Kane County when the county removed over 30 BLM route signs nearly two years ago."

Norton responded Friday that she has appointed Larry Jensen, a federal regional solicitor, to negotiate with the county.

"While we cannot prejudge the outcome of this consultation, Mr. Jensen will articulate in this consultation the applicable and appropriate federal rights and responsibilities that apply in this situation," she wrote.

She also pledged that the department would follow guidelines set by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which directed a "commendable spirit of mutual accommodation" and a recognition that "both levels of government have responsibility for, and a deep commitment to, the common good, which is better served by communication and cooperation than by unilateral action."

In August 2003, the BLM put up 31 signs closing off certain dirt roads in the monument. And that prompted Habbeshaw and Sheriff Lamont Smith to take the signs down, saying the county owned the routes under a 19th-century law known as RS2477.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

Health proposal not 'reform'

RE: RedShirt | 10:50 a.m. Nov. 16, 2009 To "Florida, the other Red State |...

Editorial: Red flags at Fort Hood

Greetings: I reckon I'm one of those folks that the DESERET NEWS considers...

Letters: A plea to senators

Mr. Olson must have studied history in the deep South sometime during the...

Whatever happens in the future, I hope the REAL fans will stick with them. I...

Cheers, maybe you are too young to remember the Utah Stars winning ABA...

I totally agree...this year the Christmas stuff was out even BEFORE HALLOWEEN...

Wounded Utes limp home

I am a BYU fan and I love all the great or not so great comments from...

Wounded Utes limp home

Who cares about how much TCU beat us by. TCU is good, don't strip them of...

For what it is worth I think that Bingham-Trinity game would have been closer...

Health proposal not 'reform'

Florida - The Other Red State, is 100% right. The GOP had their chance...

Advertisements
Advertisement