Sometimes journalists must use unnamed sources

Published: Thursday, Nov. 17, 2005 11:25 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
We who work in journalism often take for granted the different kinds of source/reporter relationships that arise, both short term — like getting to know the family of a murder victim during a high-profile crime and trial — or long term — like covering a three-term governor or 30-year sitting U.S. senator.

The public is now getting to see some of those relationships up close as the CIA undercover agent leak scandal unfolds in the nation's capital.

And this week we learned that perhaps the most famous print journalist of our generation, The Washington Post's Bob Woodward, had heard that Valarie Plame was an undercover CIA agent several days, if not several weeks, before her name was printed in Bob Novak's national political column and the whole White House/leak investigation started.

Woodward kept his mouth shut, only telling his top editor several weeks ago.

He says flatly that he never told anyone that his "top administrative source" told him about Plame because he never wrote about it and didn't want to be subpoenaed by the special prosecutor once the leak scandal broke.

Woodward's silence during all this stuff — his offer to go to jail for a few days to serve contempt time for the soon-to-be-retired Judith Miller of the New York Times (who did admit to talking to a top White House aide but wouldn't tell a federal grand jury who that was) — is odd.

Story continues below

It turned out Miller's source was "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's much-trusted chief of staff. And the editor for the Times later said Miller's "entanglements" with Libby were inappropriate.

Flash back now to the relatively boring journalism world of Salt Lake City.

I've covered local and state governments here for nearly 30 years. (Orrin Hatch had been in office just two years when I first interviewed him as a cub reporter.)

No one named "Scooter" has ever whispered to me about secret agents or weapons of mass destruction.

Instead, we get campaign finance scandals with nutty husbands stealing from their in-laws.

We get county mayors giving tax dollars to the well-intentioned nonprofits where their daughters work.

But there is one constant between the big-time D.C. scandal and the relatively-honest Utah political system: confidential sources and how you handle them.

Utah is one of the few states that does not have a reporter shield law. Neither does the federal government.

Local media leaders here are working to get (a) a judicial rule promulgated by state court administrators to give some limited source protection and/or (b) a regular Legislature-adopted shield law for reporters.

Knowing how some of our 104 part-time legislators feel about the press, my guess is the local media people had best hope for a judicial rule — and then pray the Legislature doesn't pass a statute outlawing the rule.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

wow! i cant believe this! he was a great man and no one expected this. he...

Just another example of the skewed world of professional sports...true...

LDS seminary principal is arrested in sexual abuse

wow!! he lied to so many!!!!!!

I forgot what I was going to say. Let's go ride bikes!

I have had it up to here......next time I am voting for Prop Hate!

Everyone here blames the victim over the teacher in these cases...regardless...

"friend says..." dang typos.

LDS institutions will not crack down more on this issue...they tend to...

In economic bad times if your neighbor is out of a job, it's a recession. If...

Nice Turns, Tatiana! Nice behind too ;)

Advertisements