Computerized voting is a solid winner

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2005 7:11 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
FARMINGTON — By all accounts, the voting was unanimous. It was as if the old Soviet regime materialized Tuesday at the polling station at Farmington Junior High. There hadn't been this much Election Day solidarity since the 1984 mayoral election of Leningrad.

Everyone agreed. The new computerized voting machines are an unqualified success.

"This is the way to go — the only way to go," said Mildred Olson as she exited the school library after exercising her right as an American on one of the city's new $3,600 high-tech, touch-screen voting machines. "I really don't think you can make a mistake . . ."

She paused just long enough for effect

". . . other than maybe about who you voted for."

Mildred, it should be pointed out, is 89 years old. Until this year, she'd voted all her life in the conventional way on a tangible piece of paper.

But "going computer" was as easy for her as changing hats.

"It really was not hard," she said. "All I had to do was read."

And technically, you don't even have to do that. For the sight impaired, the new machines are equipped with headphones that enable voting without seeing.

Story continues below

And if you try to vote twice, forget about it. One punch card, one vote, no exceptions.


Touch-screen voting takes no time at all. I watched as one woman, Amy Calvin, 35, completed her ballot and was out the door in one minute and 17 seconds. The performance was all the more impressive because, A) She had no idea she was being timed, and B) She was holding her baby, Samuel, in one hand, voting with the other, and keeping her two other children, Nicole and Aaron, from ransacking the library.

For younger voters like Amy, the new machines are second nature, about as intimidating as PlayStation. "I really can't remember life without computers," Amy said. "But I do remember when my parents didn't have computers."

Others, such as Nelda Oakeson, needed a little reassurance from the friendly polling station staff of Kay Percival, Floyd Breeze, Sue Smith and Janice Rose. "Anything that says computers or technology, I lose my mind," said Nelda as she waited for her husband, Willard, to finish his voting. "But once they showed me where to put my (access) card, it was OK."

"I had one tiny problem," said Willard. "Until I realized I had to push one more button, the one that said 'cast ballot.' "

The Oakesons, both 74, have voted since Eisenhower was running and wouldn't go back — at least not as far as voting machines are concerned.

"This was quick and efficient," said Willard. "We were amazed."

Nelda and Willard remembered also being amazed in their lifetimes by, in no particular order, radio, television, electric lights and the telephone.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Blazers get the unbalanced trade they seek while not signing Millsap away...

Ricky Bobby - THE JAZZ DO NOT WANT TO TAKE BACK EQUAL SALARIES. They want to...

Owls need holes for nest

Despite the fact that logging has all but stopped in the pacific northwest...

My understanding of what FAIR is trying to do, is to provide well thought out...

Jazz will resign Milsap. If they don't it will be ahuge mistake. First off,...

Stadium of Fire flag burning was fake

I was waiting for it to be burned on the big metal structure right by the...

Hey Ute fan... the Utes had a good season. And keep throwing that BCS bowl...

Tyrus Thomas is in the last year of his contract too so what is the point for...

CougarKeith, people don't know how to properly retire the flag, what they did...

It is just talk but since it was brought up: IF we can get Prizbilla &...

Advertisements