From Deseret News archives:

Are Utah fallout stories grossly exaggerated?

Published: Monday, Nov. 7, 2005 10:58 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
As a retired physics professor who has spent the majority of his life in and around a place that has been called "American Ground Zero," "America's Most Lethal Secret" and "An American Nuclear Tragedy," Daniel W. Miles of Washington County, Utah, is in the decided minority when he says the tortured stories of "downwinders" are mostly just urban myth: alarming, horrible and sad but also grossly overstated and largely untrue.

"People in this area believe hundreds and hundreds of people died from fallout," says Miles, who received his doctorate in physical chemistry at the University of Utah in 1967 before teaching physics over nearly four decades at Westminster College and Dixie College. "I estimate that it was maybe five to 10."

His estimates are based on scientific data compiled by researchers who have systematically combed through southern Utah medical records and death statistics from 1952 through 1981 — a time period extensive enough to chronicle most of the resultant damages from atmospheric nuclear testing that took place "upwind" at the Nevada Test Site from 1951 through 1958.

While it is possible — although not a proven statistical fact — that St. George and the surrounding area experienced an increased cancer rate during that period, Miles says the data suggest it was very slight. Certainly it was considerably less than the 5 percent cancer increase verifiably recorded among survivors of the atomic bombs that fell on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagaski in 1945.

Story continues below
"The truth is, the scientific community that does research in this area has never been interested in using St. George data to provide risk estimates for the danger of radiation," says Miles. "The percentages are too small. If Japan had a 5 percent increase in their rates, where the exposure was 10 times greater, why should we expect anything more than a 1 or 2 percent increase?"

If you think Miles is making sense, you're in good company. The Forum on Physics & Society, a quarterly publication of the American Physical Society, has published an article he has written on the subject in its October newsletter.

In "The Great Fallout-Cancer Story of 1978 and Its Aftermath," Miles presents his case that pits science against anecdote. He charts his personal history growing up in St. George during the above-ground nuclear tests in the 1950s and largely rebuffs the popular tales that have become accepted fact over the years about "children playing in fallout snow," "hair loss," "skin burns" and "paint burned off the hoods of trucks."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

$600 million for a 6 mile long "bridge" across Utah Lake? That should be a...

No matter who it was that did not respond, I think all of the police...

6 sons soar as Eagle Scouts

A great article! We have 6 boys (not quite so close in age), and are finding...

My in laws are raising my wife's niece (even though her mother lives at home...

Letters: Fans need to grow up

Regardless, The letter writer is spot on. Sports fans have gotten...

Agreed, they want to come to the USA for a 'better life' yet bring the old...

Ironic and sad that Coach W.'s wife got a bit roughed up due to a Ute fan's...

Prep basketball ready for change

You will lose to Skyline first. Skyline owns you. The district said...

The rivalry should be fierce and heated. It makes it more fun. But it...

Hall shouldn't have made the comments, but some people will have a hard time...

Advertisements