From Deseret News archives:
Principle matters on Legacy Highway
As we all know, a group of environmentalists originally led by Rocky Anderson and the Sierra Club sued the state of Utah to stop construction of the Legacy Highway. Because the state had apparently not completed all the preliminary work it should have, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in the plaintiffs' favor on three basic issues, out of more than 90 points presented.
Basically the court ordered the state to do three things: expand its Environmental Impact Statement effort; consider other routes through the affected wetlands; and consider in addition to the highway other modes of mass transit along the same corridor. Those seem to be three "doable" directives from the court. UDOT tells us they have worked for nearly five years to meet the court's order. It seems to me the state has gone several "extra miles" to properly complete this process.
So if we have spent all this money and effort to meet the order of the court, why are we negotiating with the Sierra Club? Are we obligated to do so? Why do people seem to believe the negotiation and settlement are at the order of the court, when they are not?
Fact: The state's negotiation with the Sierra Club has no direct tie to the original lawsuit against the Legacy. Last Tuesday's Deseret Morning News headline read, "Legacy lawsuit is all but settled" (Page A1, Nov. 1). That headline appears to say that this negotiation was directly tied to the lawsuit; it was not. UDOT decided to "negotiate" with the Sierra Club because the Sierra Club has threatened to sue the state again if it did not get its way. The width of the road and shoulders, the paving surface, the speed limit and barring trucks have nothing to do with the 10th Circuit's ruling.
It is a terrible public policy precedent to "negotiate" with people who simply threaten to sue the state. "Blackmail" is a strong word, but I don't know what else to call it.
Comments
- Vegas, Poinsettia bowls or bust 2:01 a.m.
- Wildcats face tough defense 1:59 a.m.
- Aggies look to Idaho for an example 1:58 a.m.
- Aggies host Southern Utah 1:53 a.m.
- Cougars turn back Wildcats' 1:44 a.m.
- Cougar women lose at home 1:41 a.m.
- Sloan's two point guard lineup 1:39 a.m.
- BYU football: 5 keys to victory 1:36 a.m.
- RSL's Movsisyan departs 1:36 a.m.
- Glover gives Utes last-second upset 1:27 a.m.
- BYU would like friendlier rivalry
264 - Protests against Phoenix LDS temple
211 - Thunder rolls by Jazz
136 - Letters: Rushing to judge Palin
133 - Boys basketball rankings
128 - Editorial: Poor welcome for Palin
112 - Man trapped in Nutty Putty cave dies
109 - Letters: Trump card for believers
93 - Rivalry Week is highly profane
84 - Utah, BYU are top choices for bowls
75
"You are the very epitome of self-indulgence liberal crassness. You care...
I thought it was a great parade. Isn't it the only one in Salt Lake County?...
is struggling in some aspects of his game. We saw what he did last year early...
Having explored caves as a youth and spent 31 yrs working occasionally...
How do the Utes continue to do this? They are bad enough to lose to lousy...
A little help here. Harmon says Utah should be on a 3-0 win streak. I assume...
disgruntled parents need to stay off the blogs...
Honk if you intercepted Max Hall.
however it pertinent to look at their schedule and then look at ours. Because...
and there are no ute fans, only bandwagon fans, nice try though


You can be the first to comment on this story.