Principle matters on Legacy Highway
As we all know, a group of environmentalists originally led by Rocky Anderson and the Sierra Club sued the state of Utah to stop construction of the Legacy Highway. Because the state had apparently not completed all the preliminary work it should have, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in the plaintiffs' favor on three basic issues, out of more than 90 points presented.
Basically the court ordered the state to do three things: expand its Environmental Impact Statement effort; consider other routes through the affected wetlands; and consider in addition to the highway other modes of mass transit along the same corridor. Those seem to be three "doable" directives from the court. UDOT tells us they have worked for nearly five years to meet the court's order. It seems to me the state has gone several "extra miles" to properly complete this process.
For example, we have so far spent $27.2 million on environmental impact studies. For a 14-mile road, that is nearly $2 million per mile just in study! We have also put tremendous effort into the other orders of the court. As a lawmaker, I have the responsibility to my constituents and all Utah taxpayers to ask whether UDOT has really done its job. It assures me it has.
So if we have spent all this money and effort to meet the order of the court, why are we negotiating with the Sierra Club? Are we obligated to do so? Why do people seem to believe the negotiation and settlement are at the order of the court, when they are not?
Fact: The state's negotiation with the Sierra Club has no direct tie to the original lawsuit against the Legacy. Last Tuesday's Deseret Morning News headline read, "Legacy lawsuit is all but settled" (Page A1, Nov. 1). That headline appears to say that this negotiation was directly tied to the lawsuit; it was not. UDOT decided to "negotiate" with the Sierra Club because the Sierra Club has threatened to sue the state again if it did not get its way. The width of the road and shoulders, the paving surface, the speed limit and barring trucks have nothing to do with the 10th Circuit's ruling.
It is a terrible public policy precedent to "negotiate" with people who simply threaten to sue the state. "Blackmail" is a strong word, but I don't know what else to call it.
In an editorial, the Deseret Morning News recently called those of us who question or oppose the Legacy settlement "sore losers." Last July UDOT and the governor's office brought a preliminary settlement to the Legislature. While I believe this current settlement is bad, that one was far worse. We "sore losers" have improved the original settlement tenfold. But even though it is better, I cannot support in principle this terrible turn in public policy. Principle does matter.
Comments
- Attempted murder case refiled 1:58 a.m.
- Sports on the air 1:38 a.m.
- This weekend on TV 1:38 a.m.
- Birthdays for Saturday, July 11 1:38 a.m.
- 2 men cited on LDS plaza 1:37 a.m.
- S.L. man spots stolen car — his 1:23 a.m.
- Girl critical after run-in with train 1:23 a.m.
- Probe of death treated as slaying 1:22 a.m.
- Taylorsville man arrested in robbery 1:21 a.m.
- HBO defends U. logo use in 'Love' 1:20 a.m.
- LDS seminary principal arrested
- Jazz brass debate Millsap match
- Reactions on Boozer speculation
- Teacher faces new sex charges
- Jazz talking Boozer trade?
- 2 men cited on LDS plaza
- Jazz down Oklahoma City
- 2 Tooele police officers fired
- BYU professor to work on Hebrew Bible
- Jazz finances not quite so bleak
- LDS seminary principal arrested
152 - Bronco collecting a galaxy of recruits
141 - Jazz talking Boozer trade?
136 - Blazers may offer Millsap a contract
123 - Jazz brass debate Millsap match
94 - Stadium of Fire flag burning was fake
94 - Fairness of BCS debated
81 - Chaffetz eyes challenging Bennett
74 - Letters: Single-payer system best
72 - Services bids farewell to Jackson
70
By now you've probably read about the investigation that showed just how...
Sen. Scott Jenkins was name-checked by Jay Leno Monday night during his...
Have to match and move boozer
These were rampant crime spree shoplifters and the driver was willing to...
Either way, we win. You match, you (our division rival) pay much luxury tax....
YES we have free-agency to choose however when will society or even members...
Of course the Jazz weren't going to make such an offer to Millsap. Why would...
Just reward for the Jazz. The initial offer of 1 million was an insult and...
Boozer may be the best thing that ever happens to the Jazz. Neither of them...
"As for the girl, One encounter could be seen as a victim, multiple over a...
As a current LDS Religious Educator I am sick and sickened by what has been...
Lots of times people get accused for things they did not do. And i am hoping...



You can be the first to comment on this story.