Both parties must learn from Parkway legacy

Published: Saturday, Oct. 1, 2005 6:22 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Pignanelli: "Legacy" is a 15th-century European term for something given or transmitted by an ancestor. The Legacy Parkway is more than a much-needed transportation corridor to be used by generations of Utahns; it also serves as an example to our descendants of how to avoid similar pitfalls that plagued its development.

House Democrats first learned details of the litigation resolution from UDOT officials just a few hours before the press conference announcing the settlement of the lawsuit. No member of their caucus had been involved in the settlement negotiations. (Democratic Senator Ed Mayne was part of the negotiations team but was forbidden to share information with House colleagues because of confidentiality restrictions.) After their presentation, UDOT officials could not answer important questions posed by the Democrats. As a result, Minority Leader Ralph Becker stated that his caucus — which supports a new road for Davis County — would withhold endorsement until more information was forthcoming. Normally, the Democrats would be ignored, but a number of Republicans are upset, and Democrat votes are needed to pass the legislation in special session. By asking questions vital to taxpayers, commuters and homeowners, the excluded Democrats serve an essential role as the loyal opposition — despite being demonized for their efforts. While the Democrats' stance is temporary — they will not prevent construction of the highway — it does illustrate a reccurring problem behind Legacy Parkway.

Story continues below

In the late 1990s, as the Mike Leavitt administration and UDOT started to formulate the specifics regarding Legacy Parkway, Democrats were not included or consulted. In fact, a reporter — seeking a response subsequent to the press conference announcing construction plans for Legacy — asked how then-Minority Leader Dave Jones was apprised of the project. If Jones, Becker and Senate Minority Leader Scott Howell had been included early in the process, they would have provided a valuable insight into anticipated responses by the environmental community. They could have easily worked with the well-respected Davis County Transportation Task Force Chairman Stuart Adams (now a state legislator) and other officials to craft a plan that avoided judicial concerns. Instead, sidelining the Democrats soon resulted in surrender of the construction process to environmental groups and the courts, which cost money and time. Also, Rocky Anderson was given a soapbox to launch frequent and outrageous condemnations of Davis County commuters (negligently forgetting their contribution to the Salt Lake City economy).

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Utah Utes football: Utes catch couple of receivers

I hope you realize that implicit in your post is an admission that BYU fans...

So, teams are making moves, and folks want the Jazz to do the same. ...

That is all there is too it but all signs indicate the Jazz are going to pay...

LDS seminary principal arrested in sex abuse of student

You are kidding right? It's not "just churches in Utah" that have wide...

Time for leaders to lead with inspiration and not to be impressed with smooth...

I don't mind giving up Boozer. I mind locking Millsap in at PF for the next...

Utah Utes football: Utes catch couple of receivers

Posted a long time ago...dude, what are you on? It's dated July 10th. That...

I have known people that live a double life doing extreme good in an effort...

To me, Portland has paid too much money for this Paul Millsap. And my fellow...

Folks love their violence. How about a fight to the death? It's coming.

Advertisements