From Deseret News archives:

Hatch chides Demos on Roberts vote

Utahn says foes of nominee bend under special interest pressure

Published: Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2005 9:25 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — With John Roberts poised to win Senate approval as the 17th chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Sen. Orrin Hatch took to the floor of the Senate on Tuesday to chide some Democrats for succumbing to special interest pressure to oppose the nomination.

"There are compelling reasons why the health of both the Senate and the judiciary require that this vote should be about, and only about, John Roberts' qualifications to serve as chief justice," said Hatch, R-Utah. "Some left-wing special interest groups seem to be urging a 'no' vote on this highly qualified nominee in large part to somehow send a message to President Bush as he deliberates on how to fill the remaining vacancy on the Supreme Court. If that is the case, it is a garbled, misguided message."

Because Roberts' confirmation is now assured — almost three-fourths of the 100-member Senate plan to overwhelmingly confirm him, Republicans on Tuesday began pressuring the Senate's minority Democrats to promise what they called a fair confirmation hearing and vote for President Bush's next Supreme Court nominee.

Bush could announce his choice to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor as early as Thursday, the same day the senators plan to confirm Roberts.

Story continues below
But for now the Senate is focusing on Roberts, and Hatch, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee behind Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said it is a political fact of life that political interest groups will demand to be heard. And there are Republican groups that would have wanted Republican senators to oppose President Clinton's nominees in similar fashion.

But that is not how the system works, Hatch said.

Hatch's comments appear to have riled Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who was criticized in Hatch's floor speech for demanding a "litmus test" reflecting how Roberts would vote on controversial issues certain to come before the high court.

"Some of our friends on the other side of the aisle have tried to portray a vote against John Roberts as a reflexive, partisan vote against any nominee by President Bush," Kennedy said, not naming names but using Hatch's words almost verbatim. "Still others have made the sweeping statement that any senator who can't vote for Roberts can't vote for any nominee of a Republican president."

"These broad statements are patently wrong and suggest partisan posturing that does serious injustice to the most serious business of giving a lifetime appointment to a justice on the highest court in the land," he added.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

The reason Winn overthrew and missed so many receivers is because he was...

Sad that this is how Hall's career will be remembered. Cougar fans can only...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

Frankly, I’m repulsed by his comments and the negative attention that...

Credit Coug defense for win

Thank you Max Hall for saying what we all could not! You spoke the truth. I...

Perhaps we can do more than just express our condolences, by contributing...

I hope that someone sits down with him and helps him understand his emotions...

What a stain Hall's mouth put on a much-needed victory. But reprimand him?...

Gotta love these excuses by Ute fans. All this talk about "wynn overthrowing...

No article I have read in the last five years sums up the entire workings of...

Thank you Max Hall for saying publicly what we all have thought and felt for...

Advertisements