From Deseret News archives:

Rocky's benefits plan lacks support

Advocates of health care favor council's expansion of benefits

Published: Sunday, Sept. 25, 2005 11:46 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson's firm position on his domestic-partners benefit plan isn't gaining much traction, even among groups who usually back the mayor's ideas.

In fact, Anderson's staunch opposition to opening up health-care options to a wider array of city employee dependents is being panned by health-care advocates, who say the mayor is sacrificing greater health-care access at the altar of gay rights.

Those advocates favor a new City Council proposal, which would create an ordinance offering employees who have other dependent relationships — like parents living with adult children, adult siblings, even roommates — the ability to access health-care benefits for those dependents.

That plan would also keep benefits for unmarried couples and their children, said Councilwoman Jill Remington Love, who plans to bring the ordinance to the City Council before year's end. That ordinance would supersede the executive order Anderson signed Wednesday giving unmarried domestic partners of city employees access to health care.

Anderson has opposed the council plan, saying it avoids the political statement he wants to make on equal rights for gay and unmarried couples and could cost too much.

Story continues below
However, health-care advocates — some of the mayor's biggest supporters — say the mayor should support the plan that offers health care to the most people.

"The more people you can get covered the better," said Dr. Scott Leckman, a local physician who has been outspoken about creating a universal health-care system. "With so many people uninsured I welcome any chance to get more people covered."

And while they might personally favor gay rights, advocates don't want the political issue to impede offering greater access to health care.

"We're just sympathetic to covering the most people in the most cost-effective way possible," said Jodi Hillman, health program director with Utah Issues. "The kind of statement the mayor is trying to make, it's funny, it does take us away from the issue we are trying to work on."

On that point Dr. Joseph Jarvis, president of the Utah Health Alliance, agrees.

"Health-care reform is an issue for everybody whether they're gay or not," he said.

Even advocates in the gay community say they support opening up health-care options to a wider range of people, at the possible cost of diluting a political statement on gay rights.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

best of luck tiger, youv'e dug a deep hole but if you put the same attention...

In college sports, there are currently a few distinct blues: Navy,...

There is no jury trial if this competency hearing results in declaration that...

Jazz manage a magical win

does cj ever think that someone else might have a better look at the basket ?...

Editorial: Leave the economy alone

Agreed that we don't need another round of stimulus, but to state that "it is...

You missed the point,I asked if it is proper or should be allowed for oeople...

The scene that Chris Hicks is talking about in "Blind Side" seems reminiscent...

The LDS church has always placed great importance on humanitarian service....

I have yet to see a gun law that criminals obey. All that these restrictive...

Woods to take leave from golf

He is taking time off to get marriage counseling and convince his wife not to...

Advertisements