From Deseret News archives:

Evolution back in court

District defending policy requiring pupils to hear about 'intelligent design'

Published: Friday, Sept. 23, 2005 11:38 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
HARRISBURG, Pa. — The latest chapter in a long-running debate over teaching evolution in public schools is about to unfold in federal court. In a civil trial set to begin here Monday, the Dover Area School District will defend its policy requiring ninth-grade students to hear about "intelligent design" in a preamble to biology lessons on evolution.

Intelligent design, a concept advanced over the past 15 years, holds that Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection causing gradual changes over time cannot fully explain the origin of life or the emergence of highly complex life forms. It implies that life on Earth was the product of an unidentified intelligent force.

Critics say intelligent design is merely creationism — a literal reading of the Bible's story of creation — camouflaged in scientific language, and it does not belong in a science curriculum. Eight Dover families are suing the school district, alleging that the policy violates the constitutional separation of church and state.

"Our objective is to demonstrate that the prior (legal) precedent, which forbids the teaching of creationism, applies here as well," said Eric Rothschild, a Philadelphia attorney representing the families.

The state American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United for Separation of Church and State are assisting the parents, including lead plaintiff Tammy Kitzmiller.

Story continues below
"The school board has no business instructing children about religious matters," Kitzmiller said at a December news conference on the lawsuit.

The history of evolution litigation dates back to the famous 1925 Scopes Monkey Trial, in which Tennessee biology teacher John T. Scopes was fined $100 for violating a state law that forbade teaching evolution. The Tennessee Supreme Court reversed his conviction on the narrow ground that only a jury trial could impose a fine exceeding $50, and the law was repealed in 1967.

In 1968, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned an Arkansas state law banning the teaching of evolution. And in 1987, it ruled that states may not require public schools to balance evolution lessons by teaching creationism.

The issue has become a priority for many religious groups, which accuse scientists of stepping outside their field into the realm of theology with some of their pronouncements.

Dover is believed to have been the first school system in the nation to require students to hear about the concept under the policy adopted in October 2004. But the clash over intelligent-design is evident far beyond this rural district of about 3,500 students, 20 miles south of Harrisburg.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Associated Press

Clarence Darrow, left, and William Jennings Bryan sit next to each other at the Scopes Monkey Trial in this 1925 photo. Darrow was sent by the ACLU to defend a biology teacher who taught evolution.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Max Hall issues apology

Re-posting Hall's comments just serves to further stir up fury instead of...

I only waited five minutes at the Orem In-n-Out. That was on the way to the...

For all you that are saying that RES doesn't have good security they do, YOU...

Religion in politics is tiresome

Europeans won't let that happen. i promise

U. eyes bowl for redemption

The Utes get last year. Yep, Kruger is still open, open enough to get a...

The kid had a gun a shot was fired, the officer shot him. enough said . Now...

Max Hall issues apology

Utah fans- You need to thank Max for giving you something to focus on after...

against all odds, the deseret news is SPOT ON

Utes won't respond to Hall

No response = good, calming response = better. Max was incredibly foolish...

Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal

Nice viewpoint Amy. Well thought out and substantiated by the quotes you...

Advertisements