Sandy ruling a win-win

Published: Thursday, Sept. 22, 2005 10:59 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Utah Supreme Court accomplished a rare feat this week. It handed down a decision that was a win-win for the plaintiffs and the defendants.

We refer to the new language for the referendum on Sandy's gravel pit, which is located at about 1000 East and 9400 South. The court rewrote a referendum that was factually accurate but potentially confusing to voters. Opponents charged that the wording was biased.

Now, opponents say they like the language of the Supreme Court's 64-word referendum. Meanwhile, the city is in a position where it won't have to respond to allegations that its choice of words was slanted. Now voters will decide based on the court's wording.

Essentially, voters will decide whether to keep a zoning change approved as an ordinance by the Sandy City Council in November 2004 . That zoning designation would permit "big box" retail establishments as part of mixed-use zoning at the 107-acre site. If the referendum fails, the zoning would return to a designation that allows very specific land uses but expressly prohibits home-improvement stores, grocery stores and discount stores, among others.

Few matters inflame civic passions more than do zoning disputes. This one is no exception, with allegations that at times have been tinged with wildness flying through the air. Opponents to the zoning change have charged city officials with breaking promises. Some in the city, meanwhile, lament having gone through a long rezoning process only to face the possibility of having it all wiped out by a popular vote.

Story continues below

With the matter of the referendum language behind proponents and opponents, both sides owe it to Sandy residents to conduct factual and intellectually honest debate on the referendum. Sandy residents need to go straight to the respective parties, Sandy City, the developer (The Boyer Co.), and the referendum's opponent, the grassroots organization Save Our Communities, to hear their respective points of view. We encourage voters to keep up on the issue by reading this newspaper, as well.

After all of the clashing over this divisive land-use issue, it would be a shame if voters didn't take the time to fully understand the ramifications of their vote.

Sandy voters are urged to get informed, then vote on Nov. 8.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I love Millsap, and the Jazz will find a way to move Boozer and match for...

i think its childish to assume that somebody would actually want to get...

Millsap and Boozer need to stay in Utah. Millsap is Boozers backup while he...

Childish and immature? Its always easier being ignorant and presuming things...

can you use words like testimony and church leadership to critisize a...

Bro P really helped me through a tough time in my life when I had him in...

These are only allegations at present, but I hope when he goes to trial, the...

My thoughts are with the Pratt family right now. Michael I hope you are...

It is interesting that everyone who seems to be a member comments on how nice...

You presume, simply because they were gay, that they were trying to "stir...

Advertisements