From Deseret News archives:

Football's in the air - and so is politics

Published: Friday, Sept. 16, 2005 4:33 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Autumn is in the air, and while most sane people are thinking about football, reveling in or dreading the prospect of the U. pounding BYU, our twisted minds are contemplating those political questions that inquiring minds want to know.

What are the possible ramifications of the recent announcement by Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. that he would attempt a re-election campaign without raising and/or expending contributions?

Story continues below
Pignanelli: At first glance, Huntsman's notion that an incumbent can run solely on "a track record and ideas," and not a big budget, is certainly compelling. The governor initiated his campaign with a focus on campaign and government reform, so at least he is consistent. However, most veterans agree he is begging for trouble. Huntsman also promised that he would expend political capital in order to effectuate much-needed, but controversial, changes to state operations. Thus, if he remains committed to this no-spending concept, his administration will concentrate on protecting public approval ratings, a necessity for a campaign devoid of a media blitz and not on performance. Further, this situation is tempting to a well-funded right-wing gubernatorial challenger who could bombard the airways against a defenseless Huntsman. This exposes him to the real possibility of defeat, or, at very best, limping into a second term. Campaign finance reform is needed in Utah, but it should be applicable to all candidates.

Webb: I'm not sure the governor meant that he would raise and spend no money. He's already been raising political money. I think he meant he will run a low-budget campaign and not amass a huge war chest. That makes sense. Even a politician with an easy race needs to raise some political money to use for party and political responsibilities. Things like travel to conventions and communications with political activists and voters require some money. Re-election is a time to re-connect with voters, to woo and win them one more time. It's a chance to win a new mandate, to campaign on one's success and one's vision for the future. It's a time to show voters and political activists that you care, that you don't take them for granted. All of that takes some campaign cash. Not millions of dollars but enough to get the job done.

Will Sen. Chris Buttars succeed in requiring that "intelligent design" be taught along with evolution in Utah's schools?

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Clare... Fox is too busy *Hating* President Obama to tell the truth.

Mark my words the Utes will beat TCU by 7 points and murder the team down...

Letters: Liberal rant amusing

"The D.C. Police estimated the tea partiers in Washington numbered in the...

TCU gets first sellout in 3 years

And I think if anyone in the MWC has the chance to beat TCU it is them, but...

As touching as this year has been, I agree that almost a quarter of a million...

"if lay witnesses are not mental health experts and not competent to pass...

Letters: A poisonous potion

To RedShirt | 4:06 p.m. Nov. 9, 2009 You said: “The modern...

House passes health care bill

I am liberal and proud. What are you talking about tyranny "Anti-pc" so when...

I had time to read the 2000 pages in this thing. Is there an accurate...

wonderful column. my daughter, living in Scotland, told me that the Mormons...

Advertisements
Advertisement