From Deseret News archives:

Cut lawmakers' benefit?

Axing his colleagues' health-care aid is only fair, legislator says

Published: Monday, Sept. 5, 2005 11:05 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The state legislator who led the fight to cut back retired state employees' health-care benefits is now saying legislators themselves should get no state health-care benefits upon retirement.

Rep. Dave Clark, R-Santa Clara, says tightening up lawmakers' own health-care retirement benefits is only fair, considering what the Legislature had to do to state workers in the 2005 general session. He'll introduce a bill in the 2006 Legislature to do away with health-care retirement benefits for legislators and governors.

"Sounds like this is Dave Clark's own (legislative) term limits bill," said Senate Minority Leader Mike Dmitrich, D-Price.

At 68, Dmitrich said, "I'd seriously have to consider retiring" from the Legislature in order to continue getting health-care benefits in the future.

Clark's HB213, passed last session, changed the formula by which soon-to-retire state employees can convert their unused sick leave into post-retirement health-care premiums paid for by the state.

State retirement board officials say HB213 could cut from 10 years to two years the time in which a longtime employee's health-care premiums would be paid for by the state — the employee having to pay those premiums after his or her sick leave conversion time runs out.

Story continues below
In 1998 the Legislature voted to pay the health-care premiums for retired legislators for the lifetime of the legislator and for the lifetime of his or her spouse. Any minor children of a retired legislator are covered until they reach 18. So that current legislative benefit is even more generous than what had been provided to state employees.

For fiscal year 2004-05, the state paid for 28 retired legislative health-care plans costing $120,231, the Deseret Morning News reported this spring.

The state had to cut future state employee health-care benefits, HB213 supporters said, because rising health-care costs could mean the state would have to pick up more than half a billion dollars in future retirees' health-care benefits, an amount that would "break the taxpayer bank."

HB213 gave state employees a year grace period under the old retirement formula, and it appears that a number of veteran state workers will be retiring — many of them taking early retirement — before January 2006.

Clark says his bill, should it pass, will give the same one-year grace period to legislators — they can leave before January 2007 and get health insurance for life for themselves and their spouses.

"That would be a big financial hit" to have to pick up his own health insurance payments when he finally leaves office, said Dmitrich, who was first elected to the part-time Legislature in 1968.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Dave Clark

previousnext

Latest comments

Hey Boise Fan - BYU - One National Championship Boise - Zero National...

Homer king Bonds made splash

Until he started taking steriods. You may be missing Barry but I do not miss...

Cal hopes for Best vs. Utes

"because Max Hall hates me and I'm proud!!" This was my problem with all...

EPA: Greenhouse gases harmful

Carbon Dioxid is a Greenhouse gas Venus - Atmosphere = 97% Carbon...

Cougars going back to Vegas

BYU fans routinely packed the Holiday Bowl for many years. How many Utah...

You Zoobs....already explaining to everyone why Utah will win yet another...

This story is horrifying. I fill prescriptions for my family at that...

"Regardless, people with homosexual tendencies or any other tendency for that...

Letters: Global warming a lie

12:24 p.m. You state that "we've had cloud seeding for over 100 years"......

Letters: Democrats' ethics

We don't need no stinkin' ethics reform. 'Specially not ordered by the likes...

Advertisements