From Deseret News archives:
U.S. needs amendment to protect flag
As a United States Naval officer, I thrilled at the opportunity every time I stepped aboard a warship, faced the stern, squared my shoulders and saluted the flag of the United States of America. My salute was not to a beautiful piece of cloth but to our nation and to the liberties and the ultimate sacrifices that the flag represents. It brought me great comfort and pride to know that wherever that ship sailed, the flag declared, and guaranteed, its sovereignty.
As the chief law enforcement officer of Utah, I swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States and to protect the rights of her citizens. It is with that authority that I declare my full support of Sen. Orrin Hatch's bipartisan flag amendment.
The framers of our Constitution understood that the flag was in a very real sense a protective seal declaring the existence and sovereignty of our nation. They understood that laws to protect and preserve this unique symbol did not interfere with First Amendment rights. For most of our history, this commitment to the flag, one distinguished from any particular ideology or viewpoint, was accepted and supported by our courts.
Likewise, Thomas Jefferson recognized the sovereignty interest in the flag and said the First Amendment did not prohibit "systematic and severe" punishment for those who violated the flag. Both Jefferson and Madison believed that protecting the flag did not suppress expression but protected the incidents of sovereignty, including commerce, citizenship and neutrality rights.
In 1907 the Supreme Court confirmed "from the earliest periods in the history of the human race, banners, standards and ensigns have been adopted. It is not then remarkable that the American people . . . early in their history, prescribed a flag as symbolical of the existence and sovereignty of the Nation."
Comments
- Cavs take advantage of Blazers 12:01 a.m.
- Magic coach not upset 11:59 p.m.
- $11.3 billion Utah budget 11:54 p.m.
- Fruitland home a total loss 11:51 p.m.
- Budget 2010: Transportation 11:45 p.m.
- Budget 2010: Public education 11:45 p.m.
- Budget 2010: Higher education 11:45 p.m.
- Budget 2010: Public health 11:45 p.m.
- Budget 2010: Corrections 11:45 p.m.
- Budget 2010: Public safety 11:45 p.m.
- Letters: Global warming a lie
277 - BYU football: Bronco weighs in on Hall
195 - Palin signs books, chats with fans
169 - Andersen apologizes for Jordan hoax
143 - Nude bathers cited for lewdness
138 - Max Hall wants to look ahead
130 - Jazz fall apart late at L.A.
110 - LDS to emphasize helping needy
107 - Revive full food tax?
106 - Panel passes BCS playoff bill
105
Can you tell I just got out of a budget meeting with Gov Gary Herbert?
For the latest news in the health care debate and how it affects you...
I love this list, only one issue would be Alex Hart's exclusion, I thought he...
Nice job Nick! First of many great things to come! Give a lot of credit to...
Why does everybody keep saying 6 lanes to Spanish Fork? I read 2 additional...
All 1st teamers should attend from both papers.
...has had a home invasion. None. I know several people who've died by...
Thanks Mom.
D O U B T!
I alaways make sure to rush out and buy the Christmas concert DVD as soon as...
Priesthood Authority: So many people today fail to recognize the Power of...
I just realized thia is on Verus... Looks like I am going to the HC tomorrow!!


You can be the first to comment on this story.