From Deseret News archives:

Needy families must be top priority

Published: Friday, Sept. 2, 2005 9:16 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
On Aug. 30, the Census Bureau released income data that showed only a slight increase in the number of people living in poverty nationwide. While that is certainly good news, a celebration is not in order. Child poverty rates in the United States remain unacceptably high — one in six children lives in poverty. While news articles were quick to say overall poverty did not rise in Utah (it didn't decline either), not much was said about the increase in child poverty to 13.1 percent. These children, almost the equivalent of every man, woman and child in Tooele, Summit and Wasatch counties combined, are the ones who will be hurt by cuts being considered by Congress this September.

In Utah, there are almost 100,000 children living in poverty. The official 2004 poverty threshold is $19,311 for a family of four. If a parent works full time earning only minimum wage, he will take home less than half of the federal poverty threshold. And studies show it may take double that level just to make ends meet. It's time to support hard work and make sure the children in these families stay healthy, do well in school and grow up to become productive adults.

The economy may be beginning to show signs of recovery, but it is a slow and weak recovery in comparison to similar periods in our nation's history. Salaries and wages have increased by only 2 percent, while corporate profits have skyrocketed more than 15 percent.

Census data show an increasing number of families in Utah rely on food stamps and Medicaid to make ends meet. In Utah 134,586 individuals rely on food stamps and 222,000 thousand receive Medicaid, including 140,000 children.

Story continues below
Instead of doing something to help, Congress is on the verge of balancing the budget on the backs of working families and their children. Come September, Congress will consider cuts to food stamps, Medicaid and other vital programs by $35 billion over the next five years while spending $70 billion more in tax cuts targeted mainly toward CEOs and multimillion-dollar households. A vote in favor of these budget cuts or more tax breaks is just wrong.

The Senate and House agriculture committees may cut as much as $3 billion from the food-stamp program. Since 80 percent of food-stamp households are families with children, this is the largest child nutrition program.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

What exactly were Nephite interpreters?

I know Mormons constantly say that JS couldn't have written the BOM because...

interesting, BYU owns the point spread (and most other statistics) over...

Utah group finds homes for orphans

Generally I think this is a good thing, but I have 4 problems with it. 1)...

Letters: Liberal rant amusing

Yeah an attack on our country and we are fighting in Iraq. Why? GWB started...

We live in a culture that values women as wives and mothers ideally more than...

awsome story. IT is true that the 'pokes were concerned about pitta that they...

If you want information on politics, the environment or anything else avoid...

Yup, looks like Republicans at it again.. I have learned to go without a...

Utah women lag in higher education

Why is only university considered here? What about post secondary education...

I have a proposal. Since the flat tax, also a Huntsman idea, was...

Advertisements
Advertisement