Only 3 states likely to be part of a Western primary

Utah, Arizona, N.M. look likely; Huntsman hoping to add a 4th

Published: Wednesday, Aug. 31, 2005 9:29 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Just three states may end up participating in a 2008 regional presidential primary proposed by Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., but he believes that's still enough to attract national candidates to Utah.

Earlier this summer, Huntsman joined New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson in calling for Western states to hold presidential primary elections on the same day to give the region more influence in what's already a hotly contested race for both Democrats and Republicans.

Their intent is to set a date early enough in February that the nominations of both national parties will still be up for grabs, after the nation's first primary in New Hampshire and before so-called Super Tuesday, when a number of states hold elections.

Huntsman and Richardson suggested then that at least six Western states were interested in participating — Arizona, Colorado, Montana and Wyoming in addition to Utah and New Mexico.

But now Huntsman says the total number of states involved could be only three, four at the most.

"If we could get four states — even three — it's certainly worth doing. If we get four, that's a nice, round number and would be representative of this region," the governor told the Deseret Morning News.

Story continues below

He said he's counting on Arizona to join Utah and New Mexico. As for the fourth state? "It could be Nevada. It could be Idaho. It could be Montana," Huntsman said. He's crossed Colorado and Wyoming off the list, however.

Still, he's optimistic. "If we're successful by the end of the year in cobbling something together, then we can begin to market this region to the parties and the candidates" as early as next year, Huntsman said.

This isn't the first time a Utah governor has tried to organize a Western states primary.

Former Gov. Mike Leavitt pushed for the first one, in 2000. But only Utah, Colorado and Wyoming Republicans participated, and the election ended up being held after Super Tuesday had decided the national party candidates.

Utah lawmakers refused to fund a primary in 2004, because President Bush did not face an opponent. The state's Democrats organized and funded their own statewide presidential preference primary.

The difficulty in selling states on the regional primary is both the price tag — Utah spent about $700,000 on the 2000 election — and the potential penalty from the national parties for holding the election early.

The political parties attempt to control the primary process by requiring states to hold elections between mid-February and early June. States that don't comply lose a chunk of delegates to the national party conventions.

"I am very concerned about that," Utah Democratic Party Chairman Wayne Holland said. He said it's important that Utah's minority party send as many delegates as possible to the national convention to network with their counterparts from other states.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

Blazers get the unbalanced trade they seek while not signing Millsap away...

Ricky Bobby - THE JAZZ DO NOT WANT TO TAKE BACK EQUAL SALARIES. They want to...

Owls need holes for nest

Despite the fact that logging has all but stopped in the pacific northwest...

My understanding of what FAIR is trying to do, is to provide well thought out...

Jazz will resign Milsap. If they don't it will be ahuge mistake. First off,...

Stadium of Fire flag burning was fake

I was waiting for it to be burned on the big metal structure right by the...

Hey Ute fan... the Utes had a good season. And keep throwing that BCS bowl...

Tyrus Thomas is in the last year of his contract too so what is the point for...

CougarKeith, people don't know how to properly retire the flag, what they did...

It is just talk but since it was brought up: IF we can get Prizbilla &...

Advertisements