Pleasant Grove under siege over 10 Commandments

2 organizations now have cases pending

Published: Friday, Aug. 5, 2005 9:06 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
OREM — Brian Barnard and James Harris have thrown a full-court press at Pleasant Grove's public display of the Ten Commandments.

On Friday, the two attorneys filed suit in U.S. District Court on behalf of the Summum religion, seeking a ruling allowing the religion's Seven Aphorisms to be displayed alongside the Ten Commandments.

Then on Monday, in a case where Barnard and Harris represent the Society of Separationists against Pleasant Grove, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for further proceedings a previous District Court ruling that had vindicated Pleasant Grove and permitted the city to continue displaying the Ten Commandments in a public park.

With Summum wanting its aphorisms displayed alongside the Ten Commandments and the Society of Separationists seeking the removal of Moses' famous Decalogue from a public park, Pleasant Grove is fighting on multiple fronts to maintain the Ten Commandments display as it is.

Pleasant Grove city attorney Christine Petersen declined to comment on either case Thursday.

The display in question is a stone monolith approximately five feet tall and three feet wide. The monument has been displayed in a Pleasant Grove public park since 1970.

Story continues below

This current brushfire of litigation was sparked by vague Supreme Court rulings in June that condone a Texas display of the Decalogue on the grounds that it was largely historical in nature but condemned Kentucky displays of the Ten Commandments for being foundationally religious.

In 1997 and 2002 the Summum religion successfully sued Salt Lake County and the city of Ogden in similar suits seeking to allow the Aphorisms to be shown alongside public displays of the Ten Commandments. Although Summum prevailed both times, the municipalities opted to bring down the Decalogue monuments rather than allow Summum to display its Aphorisms.

"Summum has contacted Pleasant Grove twice — in 2003, and again a couple of months ago — about being able to display their beliefs in the same manner as the Ten commandments," said Barnard, a graduate of Loyola (Cal.) Law School. "Both times, Pleasant Grove said no.

"With the two very similar cases that have already been decided by the 10th Circuit, I'm unsure why the city of Pleasant Grove thinks the law doesn't apply to them."


E-mail: jaskar@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Stuart Johnson, Deseret Morning News

The Ten Commandments have stood at Pleasant Grove's Pioneer Park since 1970. The Summum religion and the Society of Separationists have sued over the display.

previousnext

Latest comments

Actually come to think of it Webster would be an awesome fit in the Jazz...

YOU WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO WIPE YOUR NOSE EVERY TIME YOU SNEEZE, THEN THE...

Might as well plant corn, or something else to utilize the ground while we...

Apollo Sun Millsap started 31 games last season and averaged 16 and 10....

In Kalifornia they need to purge the welfare rolls, cut off free health care...

Brother Chuck, attacking Jesse Jackson on this is a new low for you.

As a percentage of the state population, New Mexico has the highest...

RC Willey is a credit institution that happens to sell furniture. Their ads...

All you geniuses. After five months, you expect the economy to turn around...

That is a great price tag for a PF/C with the tools that Okur offers. He...

Advertisements