From Deseret News archives:

U.S. soccer reaches new heights

Americans move up to 6th in the latest FIFA rankings

Published: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 9:48 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Last week, the United States Soccer team jumped to No. 6 in the monthly FIFA World Rankings, its highest mark since the rankings were introduced in 1993.

In the rankings released June 5, the U.S. checked in at 10th, but a month later it vaulted past international powers France, England and Portugal into sixth.

So just how did the U.S. National Team vault so high?

It's a complicated formula that factors in results from the past eight years, and puts the complexities of college football's BCS to shame.

The FIFA World Rankings incorporate 205 national teams across the globe from No. 1 Brazil to No. 205 American Samoa.

All matches from friendlies to World Cup matches are factored in, and they date back eight years. That's right, the United States' terrible showing in the 1998 World Cup still negatively affects the U.S. rankings, but each year in the past seven years its impact has diminished by one-eighth.

In addition to the type of match — because World Cup matches carry more weight than friendlies — five other criteria factor into the monthly rankings: wins, losses and ties; number of goals; home or away match; importance of match; regional strength.

Story continues below
According to the FIFA Web site, only the seven best results per year are given full weighting. Results from the past are given progressively less weighting year by year until after eight years they are dropped completely. In this way current success is rated more highly than past results.

Here's a more specific breakdown of the criteria taken from the league Web site:

Wins, losses & ties

Naturally a win will bring more points than a defeat in any system, but simply giving two or three points for a win, one for a draw and none for a defeat, would not fully meet all the requirements for a reliable world-wide ranking system.

Therefore the distribution of points also takes into consideration the relative strengths of the two teams. In practice this means that a win over a weaker opponent will earn fewer points than victory over an equally rated or stronger one. It is also possible for a weak team that puts up a good show against a stronger one to earn points in defeat — though as a general rule not as many as the stronger team that beat them.

Number of goals

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Bill Kostroun, Associated Press

Kasey Keller, center, and Frankie Hejduk of the United States carry the championship trophy after defeating Panama in the Gold Cup final match. The U.S. is now ranked 6th by FIFA.

previousnext

Latest comments

To: Anonymous | 3:38 p.m. Dec. 1, 2009 [I admire those churches and people...

Quality wins, bad losses for Utes

To much of one and not enough of another, will try this coach and fans...

Why can't we find Congressman Chaffetz speech on this subject found on page...

Letters: Left-wing AP

C'mon Pagan. Read your own posts, at least. I'll admit Glenn encouraged...

Sounds like he's going to run against Matheson after all, then? @Now: I...

A growing quagmire for Obama

@To "Christy | 3:01 p.m." Be proactive and do your own google search....

Remember Rose is scared to take his Cougars to the Specturm...aka the dump....

General Motors does make good cars and trucks. They did have some bad years -...

To:to -- @re-12:11 | 12:51 p.m | 2:42 p.m. Dec. 1, 2009 doesn't matter...

Terrific Jeter, we are so happy for you. You make us proud!

Advertisements