From Deseret News archives:

Hearing today in Farmington will steer proposed village's fate

Published: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 10:57 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
FARMINGTON — The City Council will fill in the blanks after a public hearing today that could welcome or squash a proposed development between U.S. 89 and Main Street.

Architect and Farmington resident David Dixon, president of Dixon & Associates, hopes the old-style plans will calm residents' worries about the loss of open space.

However, it isn't the design that has opponents worried.

"The development, as it's been shown, is actually a lovely development. It just doesn't belong in this community," said Sharon Treu, representing Citizens 4 Neighborhood Mixed Use (NMU), a group of Farmington residents petitioning for the development's rejection by the City Council.

The problem for both groups comes from a blank spot in the city's plan. City planner Dave Peterson said that the definition of exactly what NMU zoning entails had yet to be decided, and planners were working on the wording for the property when the issue came up. The council will vote on the issue after the public hearing in late July or early August.

The decision is bigger than the Old Farm village. Once voted upon, all NMU-zoned property must follow the decision.

Story continues below
Dixon, a former member of the Farmington City Council, sees Old Farm as a benefit to the city. It's estimated the development will bring Farmington $466,000 in tax revenue annually.

"I think it creates a community gathering-place that we don't enjoy right now," he said, adding that it does more than just look nice. Main Street will be redesigned to handle the increased traffic, with a center turn lane and better sidewalks. It also provides a buffer between Highway 89 and neighborhoods.

Treu is worried about the trucks and heavy traffic that will increase on Main Street. She compares the situation to Sandy and Centerville's problems with Wal-Mart, saying that the stores are "far too many and far too large" for the property's size and location. She's not alone, either.

"Almost everyone I speak with, when they understand the issue, are very concerned about over-commercializing Farmington and dis- rupting our neighborhoods," Treu said.

Developers have tried to make the project look anything but commercial. The design copies ten old buildings in Farmington to create an upscale retail development that mixes an old look with upscale retail. Dixon wants people to think of a miniature Riverwoods in Provo.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Dorian Vandergrift

Proponents say the Old Farm development would provide a buffer between U.S. 89 and neighborhoods.

previousnext

Latest comments

GO UTES!!!

Letters: Global warming a lie

@David B 6:42 p.m. Dec. 8: "That is so dumb! I think I will listen to 98%...

i don't get it. whose fault is it? i think it's the children's fault. wanting...

Letters: No man-made warming

What next, Mr. Bender, a call for folks to dig holes in their sandboxes and...

I still believe in U

Boy's tongue unstuck from metal pole

I'm glad that the boy was not seriously hurt. Curiosity sometimes hurts a...

years ago, I accompany a friend of mine who is a profiler in law enforcement...

Wow. 102 - 40. Thats incredible.

NFL local watch, week 13

Wasn't David Nixon on the roster for Oakland this week.

Hatch's Hanukkah tune

This is embarrassing...

Advertisements