From Deseret News archives:

Think tank says No Child Act is destined to fail

Published: Friday, July 15, 2005 5:02 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Outside Utah, the reaction to this state's anger over the federal No Child Left Behind Act usually falls somewhere between amusement and shock. Always, as with a Christian Science Monitor editorial this week, writers feel obligated to point out that this state gave the president his largest margin of victory last fall.

We're a red state that is seeing red over a program the red people tout as their biggest domestic-policy achievement. Of course, it's also an underfunded program from Washington, where people like to spend in the red.

I'm not sure what all that means, living as I do in a state where "red" tends to refer most often to the sports teams of the state's largest public university. Color schemes don't tend to work well with the intricacies of politics.

Still, those two facts — Utah's rebellion against the law and support for the president — are indeed ironic. But they are not contradictory. Utah voters tend to prefer conservative candidates, and President Bush fits that description in many ways. The No Child Left Behind Act, however, is definitely not one of them.

Story continues below
Or, put differently, it is the exact opposite of some of the president's other initiatives, such as Social Security reform, which is designed to put choices into the hands of the people and away from distant bureaucrats. It is as if the administration, appalled that the centralized Great Society initiatives of Lyndon Johnson have failed through the years, decided the only way to fix the problem was to install its own centralized Great Society initiatives.

That's the theme behind a recent essay Lawrence A. Uzzell wrote for the Cato Institute, a libertarian think-tank in Washington. Uzzell is a former staff member for the U.S. Department of Education as well as for the House and Senate committees on education. His feeling is that the No Child law is destined to fail because, like any centralized program, it tries to force local officials to do things they'd really rather not do.

When people are forced to do something, they'll look for shortcuts. Over time, states will find ways around the law's requirements. If too many schools are failing, or not showing "adequate yearly progress," states will want to relax the standards. Uzzell predicts this will lead to a "race to the bottom" that is typical of centralized programs.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Miles, A.K. to play Friday

Can't wait to see the new Korver. Sure hope the knee surgery and the wrist...

I have followed you from Cleveland, to Philadelphia, to Utah and all I can...

Harpring's NBA career is over

I've never seen a player take beatings like Harprings and always come back...

Re: Jazz Cop, you may be right, we'll just have to see how things pan out....

S.L. County GOP keeps primaries

Obviously the current system isn't working. This is evidenced by the...

I'm not sure I understand your post name of LOL??

I pay more attention to what my store charges than I used to now. I look at...

Harpring's NBA career is over

I agree also with this. Matt was one of the "few" Jazz players that...

Darts shake off rust for win

one of those loses was to jordan last year... hmmm...

You've got to be great at parties. Do people stop talking to you after a...

Advertisements