From Deseret News archives:

Utah frugal as host of '04 convention

Leaders spent $200,000 less than projected for state legislators meeting

Published: Monday, July 11, 2005 11:45 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
As dozens of Utah legislators prepare to attend this August's annual convention of the National Conference of State Legislatures in Seattle, a financial review of last year's conference in Salt Lake City shows Utah lawmakers were tight-fisted in their partying expenses.

They raised and spent $200,000 less than originally anticipated. But what else would you expect from a bunch of conservatives?

"It's our nature here (in Utah) to be frugal," says Senate Majority Leader Pete Knudson, R-Brigham City, who served as co-chairman of the Legislature's NCSL Planning Committee, which raised the funds and organized the social events for the July 2004 convention.

The Utah Legislature was the official host. And as such, the host state originally was supposed to raise around $1 million — no small feat — to entertain and transport the estimated 5,000 legislators and guests visiting Salt Lake City.

In the past, hosting states appropriated taxpayer money for the large events, figuring such a convention brings in a lot more cash to the local economy than taxpayers are kicking out.

In fact, a financial report on Utah's 2004 national NCSL convention shows the event brought $6.5 million in direct benefit to the state.

Story continues below
But Utah lawmakers, led by former Utah House Speaker Marty Stephens, who just happened to be NCSL president last year, decided they would raise their share of the costs locally, from Utah businesses and lobbyists.

In the end, the Legislature, along with national sponsors who yearly contribute to the NCSL convention no matter where it is, raised just enough to cover the expenses — overall, around $784,000. That was well down from the original $1 million budget.

Besides the state's share, NCSL itself spent another $1 million in organizing the speakers and four-day meetings in the Salt Palace. The state's share was mainly for entertainment, transportation, child care and activities for legislators' spouses and kids.

And entertain, the local legislators did.

By all accounts, the teetotaling Utah legislators — around 80 percent are members of the LDS Church and don't drink alcohol — had a good time. They even spent $16,935.32 on beer and wine, the final report shows, although Utah legislators probably didn't drink much of it.

"The (visiting) legislators found Salt Lake City beautiful, clean and comfortable," says Knudson. "There were those who had worries — could they have a drink? They found out that those who chose to had no problem at all."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

I find it interesting that many of the same people who say that we can't...

Cougs begin bowl preparations

None of these teams is going to be easy. They all have fine football...

Max Hall issues apology

Max, no apology was necessary, but the apology was polically correct. If...

Very good piece of writing, Amy. You summarized what many of us have been...

U. eyes bowl for redemption

How is a top 25 finish make Utah a top twenty team? I think what the poster...

Max Hall issues apology

90% of the BYU & Utah fans have class, and Hall knows it. If you don't...

This might be my favorite article I've ever read from the Deseret News. Kudos.

Y. student vanished in China

Thank you for not giving up and don't give up now brother and sister...

Child prostitutes don't get help

Dr. Lois Lee's work with children who are victims of child sexual...

Look at the preview for Pixar's "Up". The whole move is summarized in...

Advertisements