From Deseret News archives:

Hatch backs property rights

His bill would create federal go-between in land takings

Published: Wednesday, July 6, 2005 9:25 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
SANDY — Standing in hot summer sun with a wizened grandmother in the background, Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, announced his solution Tuesday to eminent domain takings across the nation.

Hatch's plan, called EMPOWER for the "Empowering More Property Owners With Enhanced Rights Act," would create a federal ombudsman for property owners who find themselves in the sights of federal agencies exercising eminent domain.

Hatch modeled his bill after a 1997 Utah law and the state's ombudsman, Craig Call. Hatch believes Call is the only such private-property ombudsman in the country. Hatch unveiled the bill because a U.S. Supreme Court decision last month said governments could take property for private development.

"The rights of private property owners is one of the most important and fundamental rights given to us in our United States Constitution," Hatch said.

"We can't just ignore this right, or decide in an irresponsible manner that this right really doesn't mean very much in the large framework we call government. We have to create better ways for property owners to protect our properties, as well (as) provide mechanisms for local, state and national governments to look out for the common good."

Story continues below
Beverly Watson, who lives in the home where Hatch held his news conference, wanted to subdivide her 2 1/2-acre lot about a year ago for an 1,800-square-foot home she would occupy. The ranch house on the property would then have gone to her grandsons, one of whom lives with her now.

When Watson petitioned the city of Sandy to subdivide her lot, the city said she was required to pay for road upgrades and bury power lines at the edge of her property. Usually, subdivision requests come from developers with multiple lots who have to pay for infrastructure upgrades as part of their development. In this instance, however, Sandy told Watson to pay much more than she thought she ought to pay — so she called Call.

Through Call's work, Sandy eventually changed an ordinance to distinguish between large developers and individuals trying to split their lots. Now, Watson and her grandsons are moving ahead with their house plans.

The Supreme Court decision allowing eminent domain for private development will not immediately affect Utah. The decision gives leeway to states for creating their own eminent domain laws, and during the 2005 legislative session, lawmakers prohibited cities and redevelopment agencies from using eminent domain in redevelopment projects. Therefore, cities and agencies cannot use takings for private development; they still may use eminent domain for public projects such as roads, sewers and power lines.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I don't see that much "Tradition, Spirit, Honor." (from the BYU football...

I agree with chase let's forgive and forget

How about it Hmmm: If you were president, what would you do? It's easy to...

Between Peterson's observations on the coherence of Mitchell's writtings,...

"After a successful NFL football career one would have much to add to...

Wow!! I'm amazed at the readers who are belittling this excellent article....

Utes won't respond to Hall

you guyd just let both things go. both coleges say sorry tell their fans to...

America! Good, one person - although they didn't dare post a name - lets...

Hall reprimanded by MWC

Having been to both LaVell Edwards Stadium and Rice Eccles when the Aggies...

Boys basketball rankings

I don't know where you are getting your info. First; where does Parowan play...

Advertisements