From Deseret News archives:

Army devices flawed

Audit cites greater risk for loss of life after failed tests at Dugway

Published: Monday, July 4, 2005 9:56 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
After reviewing records at Utah's Dugway Proving Ground, Pentagon inspectors warn that three Army reconnaissance systems — designed to detect nuclear, biological or chemical attack contamination — have a major problem.

The equipment, and the vehicles that carry it, might not operate in the contaminated areas they are supposed to detect. They failed some tests, and inspectors could not determine if corrective upgrades were ever made or tested before the systems were put in the field.

In addition, inspectors said the Army also did not verify that Comanche and Apache helicopters, Stryker armored vehicles and some in-development systems could survive and operate in such contaminated areas, as intended by war plans, even though the Army's deputy chief of staff ordered such verification and testing five years ago.

"As a result, the risk for loss of life and equipment could be significantly increased through the use of mission-essential systems that may not be fully survivable or sustainable in contaminated environments," states a March 28 report by the U.S. Army Audit Agency obtained by the Deseret Morning News.

A letter from that agency to the newspaper says different levels of the Army are still debating what action to take to rectify the problems.

Story continues below
Until that internal debate ends, the Army has denied a formal Freedom of Information Act request by the newspaper for a copy of the report. However, the Morning News was able to obtain a copy despite that denial.

The report says inspectors decided to review records for six major weapons systems to determine if the Army had complied with a directive issued in 2000 to ensure that "all mission-essential systems were capable of surviving the nuclear, biological and chemical environments in which they may operate."

The report concluded, "Mission-essential Army systems weren't fully assessed for survivability and operation."

Inspectors wrote that they found that three of the six systems — all of which were designed to detect battlefield contamination — had actually failed tests, and they could find no evidence that they ever had been upgraded. They said the three other systems never had specific, measurable survivability criteria developed to allow testing.

Systems that failed to meet key criteria include the FOX Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Reconnaissance System; the Biological Detection System; and the Stryker family of armored combat vehicles.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
U.S. Army

The Biological Detection System that's used by the U.S. Army.

previousnext

Latest comments

Cougars beat Utes, 26-23

It's time for all ute fans to log off for the night...if not maybe the entire...

Cougars honor 1984 champs

he was just telling everyone how classles the utes are. Some fans try to...

Cougars beat Utes, 26-23

I do recall a certain ute team of 2008 beat a pathetic michigan team (last...

Cougars beat Utes, 26-23

Answer me this: How many National Championships in Football has Utah won?...

Cougars beat Utes, 26-23

With the current BCS system Utah's 2004 and 2008 teams had no shot at the...

Cougars beat Utes, 26-23

Utah rushed the field after no less than 3 games last year, so get real. BYU...

So do any of the Dems want to talk about how Clinton had bin Laden in HIS...

I'm a Ute fan who attended the game today with my son. We were treated badly...

Cougars beat Utes, 26-23

I read Hall's comments on ESPN and don't blame him. Maybe he should have been...

Cougars beat Utes, 26-23

Just beat the Yoots. Since he is a senior, there is nothing you can do...

Advertisements