From Deseret News archives:

Other cities watching West Valley ambulance suit

Published: Sunday, June 26, 2005 8:42 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WEST VALLEY CITY — A trial under way in state court between this city and Gold Cross is testing Utah's new law allowing cities to take bids on emergency ambulance service, and it's piquing the interest of other cities as well.

Gold Cross Ambulance in November filed a lawsuit in 3rd District Court against West Valley City, accusing the city of illegally choosing its own fire department over Gold Cross to provide ambulance service for emergency 911 calls.

The city selected the fire department from between two bids it received — one from the department, the other from Gold Cross — to take over from Gold Cross, which has been providing the service in West Valley for decades. The city plans to continue using Gold Cross for its non-emergency hospital-to-hospital ambulance service.

"A number of years ago we were starting to have some issues of dissatisfaction with how they (Gold Cross) were handling the ambulance service," city manager Wayne Pyle said. Years of negotiations failed to "really come to fruition," so when a new state law went into effect at the beginning of 2004 allowing cities to put out a bid request, West Valley did.

Story continues below
Pyle said the city's review committee, consisting of two City Council members and an assistant city manager, looked at both bids and chose its own fire department based on what it could offer. It made its recommendation to the City Council, which unanimously agreed.

"Basically, the issues boiled down to quality of care and cost and access," Pyle said.

The fire department's bid projected that it could generate a profit for the city because all revenues generated by ambulance service fees — usually collected from health insurance companies — would go into the city's budget. Gold Cross' bid said it could operate at no cost to the city, but as a private company, Gold Cross would keep all the revenue it generated, as it has been doing.

But Gold Cross, in its suit, said the city illegally selected a bid that was not the "lowest responsive and responsible bidder."

Gold Cross' bid said it could offer service at no cost to the city and without future subsidy from the city. The fire department's bid included a table showing projected profits but "did not provide any other information regarding costs or assurances that the city would not be required to subsidize the service," according to the lawsuit.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

Gifts for gamers

There are some games I love not on your list. Arkham Asylum for one.

Daughter: Mitchell fed me my pet

Our parents made my brothers help kill and clean our rabbits before we ate...

Why would you keep it open? I would understand if there was a lot of amazing...

The government will run our health care well? Read Reader's Digest, November...

BCS stable at top, Y. up to 14

TCU stomped on the MWC so they are naturally ready to crush Florida, Alabama...

Jazz win 6th in 7 games

could you understand Dave Locke any more than my mom does and she is not even...

Notre Dame fires Weis

Attending the ND/BYU game 3 years ago in south bend, a couple of things stuck...

I missed the game, actually i heard a little bit of Locke on the radio (man...

Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal

quotes were good: Article was dumb and unnecessary.

Understanding translation process

I believe the art depicting Joseph looking at the plates may possibly be...

Advertisements