From Deseret News archives:

Who's to blame for hold up on a 4th seat for Utah?

Published: Saturday, June 25, 2005 3:54 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Webb: Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia, one of the most respected, powerful and capable leaders in Congress, has suggested a straightforward way to resolve two long-standing injustices. First, the District of Columbia deserves representation in the U.S. House (which represents the people), although not in the Senate (which represents the states, and D.C. is not a state). Second, Utah was literally robbed of a fourth House seat in the last redistricting fiasco.

So Davis is pushing Congress to give D.C. a seat (most certainly Democratic) and Utah an additional seat (most certainly Republican), which would keep the partisan proportions basically status quo.

One more seat in Congress means more clout for Utah. It means more representation on more key committees, more chances to obtain grants and funding, more chances to pass legislation important to Utah and to kill bad projects like the Goshute nuclear waste storage.

Unfortunately, Utah's House delegation has not been united on this issue. Reps. Chris Cannon and Rob Bishop have been enthusiastic supporters of Davis' approach. They attended the rollout press conference and signed on as original co-sponsors. Rep. Jim Matheson, by contrast, has been AWOL, mouthing lukewarm support for a fourth seat but doing nothing to help the effort.

Democratic support is needed to get this passed, so Matheson's indifference is hurtful.

Story continues below
Matheson and the Democrats are apparently scared of the Utah Legislature, worried that it would attempt to create four Republican districts. But they haven't sat down with legislative leaders and attempted to work out any sort of agreement.

Legislative leaders tell me that getting a fourth seat is a much higher priority for them than trying to redistrict Matheson out of existence. A number of options are available. The possibility needs to be explored of making the fourth seat an at-large seat, leaving the other three districts as is. Or, the old four-seat plan developed in the last redistricting process could be resurrected, a plan that was pretty favorable to Matheson, as I recall.

With a little negotiation, it wouldn't be hard at all to work this out to everyone's satisfaction. The reality is, Matheson is a popular congressman and capable campaigner who has shown he can win anywhere in Utah. Presently, the GOP/Demo ratio is 66/33. Moving to 75/25 wouldn't be all that bad for Republicans.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Springville vs. Dixie by the numbers

GO MIGHTY RED DEVILS!!!! This should be a great game! Good luck to Dixie as...

I have to stop and wonder about just one point. Why is the U not being...

Tavernari has matured

It's tough when an unathletic team is going for their 4th straight conference...

Funny how the chruch cowers when the almighty tax exempt status is threatened.

Letters: Sex ed is Pandora's box

"Nongovernment-funded entities" -- what is this writer talking about, Energy...

The only reason the church is trying to look OK with this is not because they...

Cindy and family, You are in our thoughts and our prayers. We appreciate...

Letters: Chosen behavior?

Religion is a chosen behavior too. Before you freak, I don't support gay...

Meet the climbing mayor

It sounds like our new mayor is a breath of fresh air. I look forward to...

It is going to come down to who can throw the ball better. I give that edge...

Advertisements
Advertisement