From Deseret News archives:
House votes to protect Old Glory
But Bennett, others likely to kill the bill in Senate
For the sixth time, the House on Wednesday passed HJR10, this time by a 286 to 130 vote. And for the sixth time it will go to the Senate, which has never mustered the two-thirds vote needed to send it on for ratification by the states.
"The American people want this," said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, sponsor of the amendment in the Senate. "I believe this is the year that the Senate will join the House to send it to the states for ratification."
But an informal survey Wednesday by Associated Press suggested the amendment's prospects in the Senate are no brighter than in the past, unless there is a switch in position by one or more senators.
The tally found 35 senators including Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah on record as opposing the amendment, one more than the number needed to defeat it if all 100 senators vote, barring a change in position.
The Utah delegation was again split on the issue in Wednesday's House vote.
Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, voted no. He said he is deeply offended by desecration of the flag, but he said the rights symbolized by the flag are what matter most, including its protections for free speech.
"Flag-burning is cowardly, but I agree with Sen. Bob Bennett when he says amending the Constitution is too drastic a step," Matheson said. "The Supreme Court has said that even offensive speech must be protected and that is part of what our fellow Americans have fought and died for."
Matheson also quoted Colin Powell, the former general and secretary of state, who said he would not amend "that great shield of democracy to hammer a few miscreants. The flag will fly proudly long after they have gone away," Matheson said.
Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, who voted for the amendment, said, "The Founding Fathers always intended for the First Amendment to protect speech. But recent court decisions have expanded the definition of speech too far to include actions, such as strip clubs, picketing and flag burning, which are clearly not regular speech under the traditional definition."
Comments
- Sports briefs 10:52 p.m.
- Top 25 roundup: Tar Heels sloppy 10:46 p.m.
- Are students safe from predators? 10:44 p.m.
- Allegations keep police busy 10:43 p.m.
- Educators convicted of misbehavior 10:42 p.m.
- Recession hits Gen Xers hard 10:41 p.m.
- Freedom of speech on campuses? 10:37 p.m.
- New curriculum focuses on Indians 10:35 p.m.
- POWs remembered at Fort Douglas 10:33 p.m.
- Higher salary for Ogden mayor? 10:32 p.m.
- BYU happy to escape with victory
230 - TCU creams U.
224 - Editorial: Mormons and gay rights
206 - Will state consider gay rights law?
149 - Letters: Strange breed in Utah
133 - Can BYU root for (ick) Utah Utes?
131 - RSL heads to MLS title game
124 - Utes remain silent about BCS
120 - Celtics crush Jazz
104 - TCU stays 4th in AP; Y. 19th, U. 23rd
91
Maybe someone out there can help me understand how raising the state...
How do you handle kids and contests? Our oldest daughter, 7, is of the...
I'm curious why the quotes in the article have been changed since it was...
BYU is NOT a top 25 team. Not even a top 40 team. I'm sure the pollsters will...
Thank you I really enjoyed this article and got some good ideas from it...
Glad Max Hall career is over. Hall was an ok QB for BYU but always choaked...
From my family and the entire Ft. Hood community, our thoughts and prayers...
Tanner Hinds for president!!
How does back to back home losses sound Cougar fans to end the pathetic...
Contrary to popular belief the 23rd District in NY HAS NOT BEEN DECIDED!...
Just to get this straight, your brilliant idea is to drop one of the only...
Mr. Wharton's views are unacceptably bigoted.


You can be the first to comment on this story.