Plaintiffs' arguments against Utah's anti-pornography law

Published: Friday, June 10, 2005 10:52 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Led by a local bookstore owner and the ACLU, the suit challenges the constitutionality of a Utah law on a First Amendment basis.

The law would require the attorney general to create a list of sites with adult content.

Shops like the King's English could face criminal charges if they don't remove "potentially harmful material" or require age verification for their sites.

Internet providers could be required to block sites with potentially harmful material, which some say would affect unrelated sites.

Recent comments

Requiring an ISP to block "harmful content" would cause more problems...

Elliander | Feb. 27, 2008 at 7:41 p.m.

I don't believe it would be that harmful for such young youth's eyes...

SeductiveFaerie17 | Dec. 14, 2007 at 1:59 p.m.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Didn't Obama and Biden just admit to the fact that the stimilus programs were...

The last part of the article about Cowherd is classic!!! I normally like the...

This man was my teacher in high school. He is my friend, he was like a father...

I like millsap, but portland just burried themselves. They made themselves...

It's amazing how quickly society is willing to vaccinate it's children with...

The first income tax was introduced during the Civil War, that's only 70...

If he really did what the evidence seems to show, I don't think he should be...

Utah needs Portland too much. It's much harder than you think to find good...

Restaurant destroyed by fire

stacy, have you ever eaten there ??

I had Brother Pratt at Viewmont High School my sophomore year... I was really...

Advertisements