From Deseret News archives:

Dixie Forest deal pleases managers, wilds activists

Published: Thursday, June 9, 2005 10:39 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Environmentalists in the Mountain West say they are hoping an unexpected deal struck with Dixie National Forest will provide a precedent to keep logging out of projects meant to protect homes from forest fires.

The showdown was the first major challenge to a project categorized under the Healthy Forest Restoration Act, which passed in 2003 with hearty support from the president but opposition from many environmental groups.

The amiable negotiations surprised both groups, said Kevin Mueller, executive director of the Utah Environmental Congress, which took the lead in objecting to the project.

"When we had a meeting to try to resolve this, both parties expected it to be 15 minutes with an 'agree to disagree' and 'we'll see you in court,' " he said. "But when we gave them a proposal and they didn't have a knee-jerk reaction against it, we saw it wasn't going to be impossible."

In fact, both sides said the agreement established a large degree of trust they look forward to building on.

"It created, for the first time, a good relationship between the Dixie National Forest and the UEC, whereas in the past the relationship has always been confrontational," Mueller said.

Story continues below
The project protested last month was intended to clear brush and some trees within a mile and a half of Duck Creek Village, a cabin community about 30 miles east of Cedar City, to protect it from potential forest fires. But the UEC, along with New Mexico-based Forest Guardians, filed an objection to the plan because it would allow logging companies to harvest some larger trees for commercial purposes.

The compromise set a cap of 9 inches on the diameter of trees that could be cut down in most areas. But the conservationists compromised when Dayle Flanigan, district ranger over the area, asked for flexibility up to 18 inches on large trees, mostly white firs that aren't used for commercial purposes, closer to the communities because of the fear that the tops of those trees could present a fire risk.

"The fact that it was more noncommercial trees Dayle was concerned about showed he really was more concerned about the fires," Mueller said.

And according to Bryan Bird at Forest Guardians, the good will that sprang from the deal, and particularly the provision to leave more of the large trees, is a product of the compromise environmentalists hope will spread to other cases.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Jazz blow big lead, hang on

Only if the players get swagger and confidence back they can make the big...

I agree Kim should also be on this list!!

First let me make it clear that I am a BYU Fan. But Honestly I have to say...

Letters: Vegas should conserve

To judge the Las Vegas water usage by simply watching a TV in the hotel room...

Anybody asking themselves what they can do at this point and getting that...

12 high schools ready for 'The Turf'

When will the State Championship games be played? anyone know?

I'd hate to be the attorney who defends this guy. Let's hope his attorney(s)...

....fire Sloan.

Anyone who thinks that those who are on assistance in regards to food and...

GOP blasts Matheson after vote

1. Health insurance is not the only way to pay for disease treatment. 2. The...

Advertisements
Advertisement