From Deseret News archives:

Wolf compromise adopted by board

Published: Thursday, June 9, 2005 9:59 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The leaders in Utah's contentious wolf management debate have apparently taken a step toward compromise by endorsing the state's first proposed policy regulating the animal.

Ranchers, hunters and environmentalists gathered Tuesday as the state Wildlife Board adopted the policy, which now begins the likely long process of gaining legislative approval.

Although not everyone walked away happy with every piece of the plan, the wolf management policy is a good compromise, said Bill Christensen, regional director for the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.

"I don't think anybody is totally happy with this stuff, but maybe that's a sign that it's a good plan," Christensen said.

Under the plan, ranchers would be allowed to kill wolves threatening their livestock, and ranchers would be compensated for livestock killed by wolves, said Steve Phillips, spokesman for the state Division of Wildlife Resources.

The board will also ask the Legislature to establish a mitigation fund for wolf-caused wildlife damage, Phillips said.

"We've spent millions of dollars to improve habitats for those critters and we think that when wolves come they need to be viewed and managed in such a way to not have an impact on wildlife as well as livestock," Christensen said.

Story continues below
A wolf policy was requested by the Legislature so Utah will have regulations in place when wolves are removed from the federal endangered species list.

"This plan is an important step in the state of Utah being allowed to manage wolves in a way that benefits the state the most," said Kevin Bunnell, mammals program coordinator for the state Division of Wildlife Resources.

"An important component in getting wolves off the federal list is for states to have regulations that ensure wolves will receive adequate protection if they're taken off the federal list," Bunnell added.

Officials have been working on a plan for about 18 months. Debate has pitted farmers and ranchers who fear harm to livestock against wildlife advocates who diligently — some argue religiously — work to protect wolves.

Wildlife officials, caught in the middle, say there is rarely any ground for calm, rational thinking when it comes to wolves.

"Yes, it has been a contentious few years, but we've finally made a compromise," Phillips said.

"Not everyone is happy with the plan, and not everyone is unhappy with the plan, so they must have done a good job. It represents a reasonable com- promise."


E-mail: ldethman@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Interpreters are religion, not magic

All of that said, the idea that it was necessary for Joseph to understand...

and Hurricane played a great game - let's give them some credit.

What other professional teams out there are greeted by their fans on their...

Wounded Utes limp home

Not a rebuilding year? Come on Cougar fan, facts are facts. 60% of the Utah...

MWC expand? Get rid of deadweight

Don't be bitter! Someday your cougars may get to play in a BCS game and...

The Jazz need to clean house and rebuild, starting with the coach.

I was thinking the exact same thing. But hey... this isn't the first time has...

Interpreters are religion, not magic

Please give us your sources of information from which you've derived your...

Whenever a writer refers to Obama by saying he "nudged" this or that... it...

To those that say we need this solution, take a look at the countries that...

Advertisements
Advertisement