From Deseret News archives:

S.L. Council backs Rocky on Fairpark stadium

Published: Tuesday, June 7, 2005 11:09 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Salt Lake City Council officially agreed with Mayor Rocky Anderson about pitching the state Fairpark as a location for a future stadium for the Real Salt Lake soccer team.

The council voted for a resolution that puts it on the books as supporting the Fairpark, but the council expressly said that its support depends on securing future financing and resolving issues such as possible noise problems.

Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson has been campaigning intensely for Real Salt Lake to choose Salt Lake City as its soccer stadium site. Anderson had previously backed a stadium on Block 22 at the corner of 600 South and Main Street but has recently shifted focus to the Fairpark west of the city because it may be a more viable option than immediately downtown, he said.

Council member Dave Buhler said that the Fairpark did not come at the expense of the downtown site but that the Fairpark seemed more immediately viable.

"If there were a viable option more downtown, I'd be in favor of that, but I just don't see that in the cards right now," Buhler said.

Story continues below
The major league soccer team, which has a contract to play in the University of Utah's Rice-Eccles football stadium until it builds one of its own, has said that it wants to remain downtown if possible but is considering all options. Real Salt Lake wants to be playing in a new stadium by the beginning of the 2007 season, team spokesman Trey Fitz-Gerald said in an earlier interview, but it wants free land and for the public to shoulder $30 million of the expected $60 million price tag.

Earlier in the meeting, a preservation advocate asked the council to consider endorsing the Fairpark for the stadium but to keep in mind the historic buildings that would need safeguarding.

"We have a greater vision for the Fairpark," said Kirk Huffaker, assistant director of the Utah Heritage Foundation. "But there needs to be more use of the buildings in order for that vision to take place."

Salt Lake City is competing against Murray and Sandy to host the stadium. Anderson said that the tax benefits of the stadium — wherever it is built — would be relatively small for the coffers of the city that eventually wins it. The allure lies in the prestige of the stadium and the foot traffic it would bring to neighboring businesses.

"We already have the infrastructure in the downtown area — the hotels, the restaurants, the transit," Anderson said. "When you have all that and a soccer stadium, it helps benefit the entire area. We have enough sprawl throughout the Wasatch Front without scattering all these kinds of facilities. They work best if they are centrally located."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Editorial: 10 years of TRAX

Sorry earlier I meant to say that tracks seems to travel at 35 miles an hour...

'Peter Frumhoff, the director of science and policy at the Union of...

The Non-BCS crowd ought to create their own title game...their own brand, and...

Letters: Democrats' ethics

That's the whole of your defense of GOP resistance to badly-needed ethics...

Your criticism should hardly be focused on Bennett alone. What about all the...

'Wired's Threat Level blog reported on November 20 that Gavin Schmidt, a...

The reality of climate change is supported by multiple lines of evidence and...

BYU professor remembered

I had the priviledge of staying in the LeBaron home on severl occasions as I...

Letters: Growing jobless rate

So the unemployment rate has dropped to "just" 10%, huh? I wonder what that...

Ahh for the love of money...what money can buy!!!

Advertisements